Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37228399›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Developing a machine-learning model for real-time prediction of successful extubation in mechanically ventilated patients using time-series ventilator-derived parameters.

Kuo-Yang Huang, Ying-Lin Hsu, Huang-Chi Chen, Ming-Hwarng Horng, Che-Liang Chung, Ching-Hsiung Lin, Jia-Lang Xu, Ming-Hon Hou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Advances in Machine Learning for Mechanically Ventilated Patients.International journal of general medicine · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kuo-Yang HuangDivision of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Ying-Lin HsuDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Institute of Statistics, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Huang-Chi ChenDivision of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yuanlin Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Ming-Hwarng HorngDivision of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yuanlin Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Che-Liang ChungDivision of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yuanlin Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Ching-Hsiung LinDivision of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Jia-Lang XuArtificial Intelligence Development Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Ming-Hon HouDivision of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Successful weaning from mechanical ventilation is important for patients admitted to intensive care units. However, models for predicting real-time weaning outcomes remain inadequate. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a machine-learning model for predicting successful extubation only using time-series ventilator-derived parameters with good accuracy. Methods: Patients with mechanical ventilation admitted to the Yuanlin Christian Hospital in Taiwan between August 2015 and November 2020 were retrospectively included. A dataset with ventilator-derived parameters was obtained before extubation. Recursive feature elimination was applied to select the most important features. Machine-learning models of logistic regression, random forest (RF), and support vector machine were adopted to predict extubation outcomes. In addition, the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) was employed to address the data imbalance problem. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC), F1 score, and accuracy, along with the 10-fold cross-validation, were used to evaluate prediction performance. Results: In this study, 233 patients were included, of whom 28 (12.0%) failed extubation. The six ventilatory variables per 180 s dataset had optimal feature importance. RF exhibited better performance than the others, with an AUC value of 0.976 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.975-0.976), accuracy of 94.0% (95% CI, 93.8-94.3%), and an F1 score of 95.8% (95% CI, 95.7-96.0%). The difference in performance between the RF and the original and SMOTE datasets was small. Conclusion: The RF model demonstrated a good performance in predicting successful extubation in mechanically ventilated patients. This algorithm made a precise real-time extubation outcome prediction for patients at different time points.

Indexed as

extubationintensive care unitmachine learningmechanical ventilationprediction model

Identifiers

PMID37228399
PMCPMC10203709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.