ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
Developing a machine-learning model for real-time prediction of successful extubation in mechanically ventilated patients using time-series ventilator-derived parameters.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Weaning from mechanical ventilation in ICU patients: research hotspots and trends in the past decade-a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning for diabetic foot care: accuracy trends and emerging directions in healthcare AI.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in mechanical ventilation: a narrative review of clinical applications and research gaps.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Machine learning performance for a small dataset: random oversampling improves data imbalances and fairness.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and associated complications in diabetic patients with Grade 1 stress injury based on a TriNetX Retrospective Study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predicting failure of extubation and non-invasive respiratory support in critically ill patients: clinical complexity, limitations of traditional indices, and machine learning perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- RMS: a ML-based system for ICU respiratory monitoring and resource planning.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing Stroke Severity Based on Collateral Circulation, Clinical Markers and Machine Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Predicting weaning failure from invasive mechanical ventilation: The promise and pitfalls of clinical prediction scores.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025Review
- Role of artificial intelligence in enhancing mechanical ventilation - A peek into the future.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Using ML techniques to predict extubation outcomes for patients with central nervous system injuries in the Yun-Gui Plateau.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing healthcare AI stability with edge computing and machine learning for extubation prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automated mechanical ventilator design and analysis using neural network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Post-surgical fall risk prediction: a machine learning approach for spine and lower extremity procedures.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Advances in Machine Learning for Mechanically Ventilated Patients.International journal of general medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in acute respiratory distress syndrome management: recent advances.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Using Artificial Intelligence to Predict Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Success in Patients with Respiratory Failure, Including Those with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Applying artificial intelligence to predict falls for inpatient.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Successful weaning from mechanical ventilation is important for patients admitted to intensive care units. However, models for predicting real-time weaning outcomes remain inadequate. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a machine-learning model for predicting successful extubation only using time-series ventilator-derived parameters with good accuracy. Methods: Patients with mechanical ventilation admitted to the Yuanlin Christian Hospital in Taiwan between August 2015 and November 2020 were retrospectively included. A dataset with ventilator-derived parameters was obtained before extubation. Recursive feature elimination was applied to select the most important features. Machine-learning models of logistic regression, random forest (RF), and support vector machine were adopted to predict extubation outcomes. In addition, the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) was employed to address the data imbalance problem. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC), F1 score, and accuracy, along with the 10-fold cross-validation, were used to evaluate prediction performance. Results: In this study, 233 patients were included, of whom 28 (12.0%) failed extubation. The six ventilatory variables per 180 s dataset had optimal feature importance. RF exhibited better performance than the others, with an AUC value of 0.976 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.975-0.976), accuracy of 94.0% (95% CI, 93.8-94.3%), and an F1 score of 95.8% (95% CI, 95.7-96.0%). The difference in performance between the RF and the original and SMOTE datasets was small. Conclusion: The RF model demonstrated a good performance in predicting successful extubation in mechanically ventilated patients. This algorithm made a precise real-time extubation outcome prediction for patients at different time points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.