Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37228325›Full record

ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2023

Evaluation of solid-lipid nanoparticles formulation of methotrexate for anti-psoriatic activity.

Debarati Maiti, Mohammed Naseeruddin Inamdar, Mansour Almuqbil, Sarasija Suresh, Syed Mohammed Basheeruddin Asdaq, Sultan Alshehri, Saad Ali Al Arfaj, Ali Musharraf Alamri, Meshal Meshary Aldohyan, Misfir Theeb Alqahtani and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Debarati MaitiDepartment of Pharmacology, Al-Ameen College of Pharmacy, Bangalore, India.
Mohammed Naseeruddin InamdarDepartment of Pharmacology, Al-Ameen College of Pharmacy, Bangalore, India.
Mansour AlmuqbilDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Sarasija SureshRGV Research and Innovations Pvt Ltd (RGVRI), Bangalore, India.
Syed Mohammed Basheeruddin AsdaqDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, AlMaarefa University, Dariyah, 13713, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sultan AlshehriDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, AlMaarefa University, Ad Diriyah 13713, Saudi Arabia.
Saad Ali Al ArfajKing Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Ministry of National Guard, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ali Musharraf AlamriKing Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Ministry of National Guard, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Meshal Meshary AldohyanKing Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Ministry of National Guard, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Misfir Theeb AlqahtaniKing Salman Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Turki Mohammed AlosaimiKing Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Ministry of National Guard, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sami Haran AlenaziKing Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Ministry of National Guard, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Moneer E AlmadaniDepartment of clinical medicine, College of medicine, AlMaarefa University, Dariyah, Riyadh 13713, Saudi Arabia.
Jameel Ahmed S MullaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Shree Santkrupa College of Pharmacy, Ghogaon, Karad, Maharashtra, India.
Syed Imam RabbaniDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdulaziz Medical City · SAAl-Ameen College of Pharmacy · INAlmaarefa UniversityAlfaisal University · SAHindu College of Pharmacy · INKing Saud University · SAQassim University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Objectives: Methotrexate (MTX) is commonly used to manage psoriasis. The drug has erratic absorption characteristics and shows several complications. The present study uses different experimental models to evaluate the solid-lipid nanoparticles of MTX (SLN-MTX) for the anti-psoriatic effect. Methods: A prepared SLN-MTX formulation was used and its permeability studies were conducted on Wistar rat abdominal skin. The organ-level distribution of the drug in the formulation was tested in mice and the Results: The data suggested that MTX from the formulation was slowly released and completely (80.36%) permeated through the skin. The flux and permeation data were found to be maximum for SLN-MTX compared to marketed and standard preparations. MTX in the formulation was found to be distributed more in the liver (67.5%) and kidney (2.34%). Further, SLN-MTX formulation showed dose-dependent inhibition on the growth of keratinocytes, and the cytotoxic concentration (CTC50) was found to be the least (518 mcg/ml). Interpretation & Conclusion: The findings suggested that MTX in solid-lipid nanoparticles could be a promising formulation for the management of psoriasis since the drug was slowly released, progressively inhibited the growth of keratinocytes, and distributed mostly in organs meant for elimination. More studies in this direction might establish the precise safety and efficacy of SLN-MTX formulation in psoriasis.

Indexed as

DistributionKeratinocytesMethotrexatePermeabilitySolid-lipid nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID37228325
PMCPMC10203772
OpenAlexW4365815488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.