Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37228169›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

Canonical Response Parameterization: Quantifying the structure of responses to single-pulse intracranial electrical brain stimulation.

Kai J Miller, Klaus-Robert Müller, Gabriela Ojeda Valencia, Harvey Huang, Nicholas M Gregg, Gregory A Worrell, Dora Hermes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Macroscale Traveling Waves Evoked by Single-Pulse Stimulation of the Human Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Signatures of Electrical Stimulation Driven Network Interactions in the Human Limbic System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kai J MillerDept of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6687-6422
Klaus-Robert MüllerGoogle Research, Brain Team, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3861-7685
Gabriela Ojeda ValenciaDept of Biomedical Engineering & Physiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Harvey HuangMedical Scientist Training Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Nicholas M GreggDept of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6151-043X
Gregory A WorrellDept of Biomedical Engineering & Physiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Dora HermesDept of Biomedical Engineering & Physiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Mayo Clinic · USKorea University · KRMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002379 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI NILUFER ERTEKIN-TANER · 2017 to 2026
$14.9M
Reliable Seizure Prediction Using Physiological Signals and Machine LearningR01NS092882 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Gregory A Worrell · 2015 to 2026
$5.7M
An Ecosystem of Technology and Protocols for Adaptive Neuromodulation Research in HumansU01NS128612 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Peter Brunner, Kai Miller · 2022 to 2026
$4.5M
Neurophysiologically Based Brain State Tracking & Modulation in Focal EpilepsyUH2NS095495 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WORRELL, GREGORY A · 2015 to 2018
$4.2M
Neurophysiologically Based Brain State Tracking & Modulation in Focal EpilepsyUH3NS095495 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WORRELL, GREGORY A · 2019 to 2021
$2.8M
CRCNS: Processing speed in the human connectome across the lifespanR01MH122258 · NIMH · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI HERMES, DORA · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
Dynamics and Causal Functions of Large-Scale Cortical and Subcortical NetworksU01NS108916 · NINDS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI WOLPAW, JONATHAN RICKEL · 2018 to 2019
$1.4M
Optimizing Pharmacotherapy with Noninvasive Wearable Sensors and Subscalp EEGUH3NS123066 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Benjamin H Brinkmann, Gregory A Worrell · 2025 to 2026
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002379NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122258NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092882NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS108916NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS128612NINDS NIH HHS UH2 NS095495NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS095495NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS123066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-pulse electrical stimulation in the nervous system, often called cortico-cortical evoked potential (CCEP) measurement, is an important technique to understand how brain regions interact with one another. Voltages are measured from implanted electrodes in one brain area while stimulating another with brief current impulses separated by several seconds. Historically, researchers have tried to understand the significance of evoked voltage polyphasic deflections by visual inspection, but no general-purpose tool has emerged to understand their shapes or describe them mathematically. We describe and illustrate a new technique to parameterize brain stimulation data, where voltage response traces are projected into one another using a semi-normalized dot product. The length of timepoints from stimulation included in the dot product is varied to obtain a temporal profile of structural significance, and the peak of the profile uniquely identifies the duration of the response. Using linear kernel PCA, a canonical response shape is obtained over this duration, and then single-trial traces are parameterized as a projection of this canonical shape with a residual term. Such parameterization allows for dissimilar trace shapes from different brain areas to be directly compared by quantifying cross-projection magnitudes, response duration, canonical shape projection amplitudes, signal-to-noise ratios, explained variance, and statistical significance. Artifactual trials are automatically identified by outliers in sub-distributions of cross-projection magnitude, and rejected. This technique, which we call "Canonical Response Parameterization" (CRP) dramatically simplifies the study of CCEP shapes, and may also be applied in a wide range of other settings involving event-triggered data.

Indexed as

BrainEvoked PotentialsBrain MappingElectric StimulationElectrodes, Implanted

Identifiers

PMID37228169
PMCPMC10246848
OpenAlexW4378195091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.