Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37228089›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2023

Use of the dTAG system in vivo to degrade CDK2 and CDK5 in adult mice and explore potential safety liabilities.

Paul Yenerall, Tae Sung, Kiran Palyada, Jessie Qian, Seda Arat, Steven W Kumpf, Shih-Wen Wang, Kathleen Biddle, Carlos Esparza, Stephanie Chang and 19 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul YenerallPfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3912-0571
Tae SungPfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Kiran PalyadaPfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Jessie QianPfizer, Groton, Connecticut 06340, USA.
Seda AratPfizer, Groton, Connecticut 06340, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3988-1947
Steven W KumpfPfizer, Groton, Connecticut 06340, USA.
Shih-Wen WangPfizer, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Kathleen BiddlePfizer, Groton, Connecticut 06340, USA.
Carlos EsparzaPfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Stephanie ChangPfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Wesley ScottPfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Walter CollettePfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Taylor-Symon WinrowPfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Tim AffolterPfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Norimitsu ShiraiPfizer, Groton, Connecticut 06340, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0730-8836
Stephane ThibaultPfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Julia WangPfizer, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6640-0718
Ling LiuPfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Mary BauchmannPfizer, Groton, Connecticut 06340, USA.
Jessica FreyPfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4298-1973
Stefanus SteynPfizer, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Aida SacaanPfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Allison VitskyPfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Youngwook AhnPfizer, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5988-7388
Tom PaulPfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Lawrence LumPfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6119-0253
Jon OyerPfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5479-3400
Amy YangPfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Wenyue HuPfizer, San Diego, California 92121, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4662-3727
Pfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The degradation tag (dTAG) system for target protein degradation can remove proteins from biological systems without the drawbacks of some genetic methods, such as slow kinetics, lack of reversibility, low specificity, and the inability to titrate dosage. These drawbacks can make it difficult to compare toxicity resulting from genetic and pharmacological interventions, especially in vivo. Because the dTAG system has not been studied extensively in vivo, we explored the use of this system to study the physiological sequalae resulting from CDK2 or CDK5 degradation in adult mice. Mice with homozygous knock-in of the dTAG sequence onto CDK2 and CDK5 were born at Mendelian ratios despite decreased CDK2 or CDK5 protein levels in comparison with wild-type mice. In bone marrow cells and duodenum organoids derived from these mice, treatment with the dTAG degrader dTAG-13 resulted in rapid and robust protein degradation but caused no appreciable change in viability or the transcriptome. Repeated delivery of dTAG-13 in vivo for toxicity studies proved challenging; we explored multiple formulations in an effort to maximize degradation while minimizing formulation-related toxicity. Degradation of CDK2 or CDK5 in all organs except the brain, where dTAG-13 likely did not cross the blood brain barrier, only caused microscopic changes in the testis of CDK2dTAG mice. These findings were corroborated with conditional CDK2 knockout in adult mice. Our results suggest that the dTAG system can provide robust protein degradation in vivo and that loss of CDK2 or CDK5 in adult mice causes no previously unknown phenotypes.

Indexed as

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 5ProteinsAnimalsMaleMiceProteolysisCyclin-Dependent Kinase 5ProteinsCDK2CDK5degradationmicePROTACtoxicity

Identifiers

PMID37228089
PMCPMC10306401
OpenAlexW4378193895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.