Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37228001›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Assessment of quality of essential medicines in public health care facilities of Nepal: Findings of nationwide study.

Neelam Dhakal, Pradip Gyanwali, Baburam Humagain, Rajendra Bc, Nisha Jha, Phoolgen Sah, Amita Pradhan, Meghnath Dhimal, Anjani Kumar Jha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bioprospecting ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Neelam DhakalNepal Health Research Council, Ramshahpath, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6247-3119
Pradip GyanwaliDepartment of Pharmacology, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Baburam HumagainManagement Section for Health (MSH), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Rajendra BcNepal Health Research Council, Ramshahpath, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Nisha JhaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, KIST Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Phoolgen SahDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Janamaitri Foundation, Institute Of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Amita PradhanDepartment of Community Dentistry, People's Dental College and Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0363-8627
Meghnath DhimalNepal Health Research Council, Ramshahpath, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Anjani Kumar JhaNepal Health Research Council, Ramshahpath, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Essential medicines are those medicines that satisfy the primary health care needs of the citizens. Poor quality of essential medicines can have serious impact on public health. Thus, this study is aimed to assess the quality of essential medicines available in public health care facilities of Nepal. A cross sectional descriptive study was carried out in 62 health facilities across 21 districts, representing all seven provinces of Nepal and selected proportionately from all three ecological regions i.e. Terai, Hill and Mountain using lottery method. Health facilities in selected districts were chosen using random number generator. Face to face interview was taken with health facility in charge using structured questionnaire. All storage conditions information was recorded through observation checklists. Temperature and humidity were measured using a digital instrument. Similarly, 20 different generic medicines were collected for quality testing. The obtained data were entered in Epidata version 3.1, cleaned in Microsoft Excel 2007 and analyzed in SPSS version 16.0. Among 62 health facilities, only 13% of health facilities were found to follow the medicine storage guidelines, with temperature and humidity levels exceeding recommended limits. Out of 244 batches of 20 different generics of essential medicines, 37 batches were found to be substandard. These substandard medicines were- Ciprofloxacin hydrochloride eye/ear drop, Iron supplement tablets, Metformin Hydrochloric tablet, Metronidazole Tablets, Paracetamol Oral suspension, Paracetamol tablet and Povidone Iodine solution. The study recommends the urgent need for the Government of Nepal to prioritize ensuring the quality of essential medicines in the country.

Identifiers

PMID37228001
PMCPMC10212095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.