Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37227790›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2023

Modulating Phonological Working Memory With Anodal High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to the Anterior Portion of the Supplementary Motor Area.

Amy Berglund-Barraza, Sarah Carey, John Hart, Sven Vanneste, Julia L Evans

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amy Berglund-BarrazaChild Language and Cognitive Processes Laboratory, The University of Texas at Dallas.ORCID 0000-0001-9924-5419
Sarah CareyChild Language and Cognitive Processes Laboratory, The University of Texas at Dallas.
John HartCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory of Memory and Language, The University of Texas at Dallas.
Sven VannesteLab for Clinical & Integrative Neuroscience, Trinity College Institute for Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Julia L EvansChild Language and Cognitive Processes Laboratory, The University of Texas at Dallas.
The University of Texas at Dallas · USTrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

Cognitive Representation in Specific Language ImpairmentR01DC005650 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI EVANS, JULIA L · 2002 to 2010
$2.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhonological working memory is key to vocabulary acquisition, spoken word recognition, real-time language processing, and reading. Transcranial direct current stimulation, when coupled with behavioral training, has been shown to facilitate speech motor output processes, a key component of nonword repetition, the primary task used to assess phonological working memory. In this study, we examined the efficacy of combining overt nonword repetition training with anodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD tDCS) to the presupplementary motor area (preSMA) to enhance nonword repetition.

objectiveThis study investigated whether 20 min of active or sham anodal HD tDCS targeting preSMA concurrently with a nonword repetition task differentially impacted nonword repetition ability.

methodTwenty-eight neurotypical college-age adults (18-25 years; 19 females, eight males, one nonbinary) completed a 20-min nonword repetition training task where they received either active or sham 1-mA anodal HD tDCS to the preSMA while overtly repeating a list of four-, five-, six-, and seven-syllable English-like nonwords presented in a random order. Whole nonword accuracy and error patterns (phoneme and syllable) were measured prior to and following training.

resultsFollowing training, both groups showed a decrease in nonword repetition accuracy. The drop in performance was significantly greater for the active stimulation group compared to the sham stimulation group at the four-syllable nonword length. DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that targeting the speech motor component of nonword repetition through overt training and HD tDCS to the preSMA does not enhance phonological working memory ability.

Indexed as

Motor CortexTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermPhoneticsSpeechYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID37227790
PMCPMC10465152
OpenAlexW4378212456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.