Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37227772›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Generate Analysis-Ready Data for Real-world Evidence: Tutorial for Harnessing Electronic Health Records With Advanced Informatic Technologies.

Jue Hou, Rachel Zhao, Jessica Gronsbell, Yucong Lin, Clara-Lea Bonzel, Qingyi Zeng, Sinian Zhang, Brett K Beaulieu-Jones, Griffin M Weber, Thomas Jemielita and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Jue HouDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9015-1827
Rachel ZhaoDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5808-8012
Jessica GronsbellDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5360-5869
Yucong LinInstitute of Engineering Medicine, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9039-0318
Clara-Lea BonzelDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5238-1413
Qingyi ZengDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-4259-522X
Sinian ZhangSchool of Statistics, Renmin University of China, Bejing, China.ORCID 0009-0004-2760-6982
Brett K Beaulieu-JonesDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6700-1468
Griffin M WeberDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2597-881X
Thomas JemielitaMerck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7788-1828
Shuyan Sabrina WanMerck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-7421-5396
Chuan HongDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7056-9559
Tianrun CaiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5772-7460
Jun WenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5067-2647
Vidul Ayakulangara PanickanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0616-0403
Kai-Li LiawMerck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-1769-3111
Katherine LiaoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4797-3200
Tianxi CaiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5379-2502
Harvard University · USMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USUniversity of Minnesota · USBeijing Institute of Technology · CNBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDuke University · USRenmin University of China · CNUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

VERITY: Value and Evidence in Rheumatology using bioInformaTics, and advanced analYticsP30AR072577 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Elena Losina · 2017 to 2026
$9.8M
Biases introduced by filtering electronic health records for patients with "complete data"R01LM013345 · NLM · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI WEBER, GRIFFIN M · 2020 to 2023
$1.4M
Characterizing Population Differences between Clinical Trial and Real World PopulationsK99NS114850 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI BEAULIEU-JONES, BRETT K · 2021 to 2022
$186k
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR072577NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS114850NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for establishing the efficacy and safety of a medical treatment, real-world evidence (RWE) generated from real-world data has been vital in postapproval monitoring and is being promoted for the regulatory process of experimental therapies. An emerging source of real-world data is electronic health records (EHRs), which contain detailed information on patient care in both structured (eg, diagnosis codes) and unstructured (eg, clinical notes and images) forms. Despite the granularity of the data available in EHRs, the critical variables required to reliably assess the relationship between a treatment and clinical outcome are challenging to extract. To address this fundamental challenge and accelerate the reliable use of EHRs for RWE, we introduce an integrated data curation and modeling pipeline consisting of 4 modules that leverage recent advances in natural language processing, computational phenotyping, and causal modeling techniques with noisy data. Module 1 consists of techniques for data harmonization. We use natural language processing to recognize clinical variables from RCT design documents and map the extracted variables to EHR features with description matching and knowledge networks. Module 2 then develops techniques for cohort construction using advanced phenotyping algorithms to both identify patients with diseases of interest and define the treatment arms. Module 3 introduces methods for variable curation, including a list of existing tools to extract baseline variables from different sources (eg, codified, free text, and medical imaging) and end points of various types (eg, death, binary, temporal, and numerical). Finally, module 4 presents validation and robust modeling methods, and we propose a strategy to create gold-standard labels for EHR variables of interest to validate data curation quality and perform subsequent causal modeling for RWE. In addition to the workflow proposed in our pipeline, we also develop a reporting guideline for RWE that covers the necessary information to facilitate transparent reporting and reproducibility of results. Moreover, our pipeline is highly data driven, enhancing study data with a rich variety of publicly available information and knowledge sources. We also showcase our pipeline and provide guidance on the deployment of relevant tools by revisiting the emulation of the Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group Trial on laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy in patients with early-stage colon cancer. We also draw on existing literature on EHR emulation of RCTs together with our own studies with the Mass General Brigham EHR.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsElectronic Health RecordsAlgorithmsHumansInformaticsResearch Designdata curationelectronic health recordsmedical informaticsrandomized controlled trialsreal-world evidencereproducibility

Identifiers

PMID37227772
PMCPMC10251230
OpenAlexW4378172411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.