Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37227587›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2023

Preventing and Treating Infection in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Alexander R Markes, Joseph Bigham, C Benjamin Ma, Jaicharan J Iyengar, Brian T Feeley

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Imaging assessment and treatment of Charcot arthropathy of the shoulder assisted by NGH classification].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The shoulder microbiome: a systematic review and meta analysis.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2024
    Review
  11. Preventing Infections in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander R MarkesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, 1500 Owens Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. Alexander.Markes@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4234-9780
Joseph BighamDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
C Benjamin MaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, 1500 Owens Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Jaicharan J IyengarStockton Shoulder Institute at Alpine Orthopaedics, Stockton, CA, USA.
Brian T FeeleyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, 1500 Owens Street, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USCleveland Shoulder Institute · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPeriprosthetic infection after shoulder arthroplasty is relatively uncommon though associated with severe long-term morbidity when encountered. The purpose of the review is to summarize the recent literature regarding the definition, clinical evaluation, prevention, and management of prosthetic joint infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. RECENT

findingsThe landmark report generated at the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection has provided a framework for diagnosis, prevention, and management of periprosthetic infections after shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder specific literature with validated interventions to reduce prosthetic joint infection is limited; however existing literature from retrospective studies and from total hip and knee arthroplasty allows us to make relative guidelines. One and two-stage revisions seem to demonstrate similar outcomes; however, no controlled comparative studies exist limiting the ability to make definitive recommendations between the two options. We report on recent literature regarding the current diagnostic, preventative, and treatment options for periprosthetic infection after shoulder arthroplasty. Much of the literature does not distinguish between anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and further high-level shoulder specific studies are needed to answer questions generated from this review.

Indexed as

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplastyDiagnosisManagementPreventionProsthetic joint infectionReverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID37227587
PMCPMC10382412
OpenAlexW4378173336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.