Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37227524›Full record

Observational studyLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023

Optimal waiting period to surgical treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectum cancer: a retrospective observational study.

Khayal Aslanov, Ali Emre Atici, Damlanur Karaman, Emine Bozkurtlar, Şevket Cumhur Yegen

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khayal AslanovDepartment of General Surgery, Pendik Education and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, 34899, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali Emre AticiDepartment of General Surgery, Pendik Education and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, 34899, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey. ali.emre@marmara.edu.tr.
Damlanur KaramanDepartment of Pathology, Pendik Education and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, 34899, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey.
Emine BozkurtlarDepartment of Pathology, Pendik Education and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, 34899, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey.
Şevket Cumhur YegenDepartment of General Surgery, Pendik Education and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, 34899, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey.
Marmara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal waiting period after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancers is still controversial. The literature has different results regarding the effect of waiting periods on clinical and oncological outcomes. We aimed to investigate the effects of these different waiting periods on clinical, pathological, and oncological outcomes.

methodsBetween January 2014 and December 2018, a total of 139 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma, who were treated in the Department of General Surgery at the Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, were enrolled in the study. The patients were split into three groups according to waiting time for surgery after neoadjuvant treatment: group 1 (n = 51) included patients that have 7 weeks and less (≤ 7 weeks) time interval, group 2 (n = 45) 8 to 10 weeks (8-10 weeks), group 3 (n = 43) 11 weeks and above (11 weeks ≤). Their database records, which were entered prospectively, were analyzed retrospectively.

resultsThere were 83 (59.7%) males and 56 (40.3%) females. The median age was 60 years, and there was no statistical difference between the groups regarding age, gender, BMI, ASA score, ECOG performance score, tumor location, and preoperative CEA values. Also, we found no significant differences regarding operation times, intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. According to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification, severe early postoperative complications (CD 3 and above) were observed in 9 patients. The complete pathological response (pCR, ypT0N0) was observed in 21 (15.1%) patients. The groups had no significant difference regarding 3-year disease-free and 3-year overall survival (p = 0.3, p = 0.8, respectively). Local recurrence was observed in 12 of 139 (8.6%) patients and distant metastases occurred in 30 of 139 (21.5%) patients during the follow-up period. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of both local recurrence and distant metastasis (p = 0.98, p = 0.43, respectively).

conclusionThe optimal time for postoperative complications and sphincter-preserving surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is 8-10 weeks. The different waiting periods do not affect disease-free and overall survival. While long-term waiting time does not make a difference in pathological complete response rates, it negatively affects the TME quality rate.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPostoperative ComplicationsRectumRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeIntervalLocally advanced rectal cancerNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyWaiting period

Identifiers

PMID37227524
OpenAlexW4378171918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.