Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37227499›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2023

Reliability and agreement of the timed up and go test in children and teenagers with autism spectrum disorder.

Paloma Martín-Díaz, María Carratalá-Tejada, Francisco Molina-Rueda, Alicia Cuesta-Gómez

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paloma Martín-DíazInternational PhD School, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28008, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0006-6512
María Carratalá-TejadaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain. maria.carratala@urjc.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2825-8655
Francisco Molina-RuedaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8616-5505
Alicia Cuesta-GómezDepartment of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9507-2717
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ASD patients include a variety of motor deficits; however, these issues have received less scientific attention than other ASD symptoms. Due to understanding and behavioral difficulties, it might be difficult to administer motor assessment measures to children and adolescents with ASD. To evaluate motor challenges in this population, including gait and dynamic balance issues, the timed up and go test (TUG) may be a simple, easy to apply, quick, and inexpensive tool. This test measures in seconds the time it takes for an individual to get up from a standard chair walk 3 m, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down again. The study purpose was to evaluate the inter- and intra-rater reliability of TUG test in children and teenagers with ASD. A total of 50 children and teenagers with ASD (43 boys and 7 girls) between 6 and 18 years were included. Reliability was verified by the intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, and minimum detectable change. The agreement was analyzed by the Bland-Altman method. A good intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.79-0.93) and an excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0,99; 95% CI = 0.98 to 0.99) were observed. Additionally, Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that there was no evidence of bias in either the replicates or between examiners. Furthermore, the limits of agreement (LOAs) between the testers and test replicates were close, indicating that there was little variation between measurements.       Conclusions: The test TUG showed strong intra- and inter-rater reliability values, low proportion of measurement errors, and lack of significant bias based on by test repetition in children and teenagers with ASD. These results could be clinically useful for assessing balance and the risk of falls in children and teenagers with ASD. However, the present study is not free of limitations, such as the use of a non-probabilistic sampling. What is Known: • People with ASD have a variety of motor deficits that have a prevalence rate almost as common as intellectual disability. In our knowledge, there are no studies that provide data on the reliability of the use of scales or assessment tests in children and adolescents with ASD to measure motor difficulties, such as gait and dynamic balance, in children and teenagers with ASD. • Timed up and go test (TUG) could be a possible tool to measure this motor skills. What is New: • The reliability and agreement of the Timed up and go test in 50 children and teenagers with autism spectrum disorder showed strong intra- and inter-rater reliability values, low proportion of measurement errors, and lack of significant bias based on by test repetition.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMalePostural BalanceReproducibility of ResultsTime and Motion StudiesWalkingAutism spectrum disorderBalanceChildrenGaitMeasureReliability

Identifiers

PMID37227499
PMCPMC10209578
OpenAlexW4378173539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.