Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37227272›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2023

Development, Evaluation, and Multisite Deployment of a Machine Learning Decision Tree Algorithm To Optimize Urinalysis Parameters for Predicting Urine Culture Positivity.

Jansen N Seheult, Michelle N Stram, Lydia Contis, Raymond E Pontzer, Stephanie Hardy, William Wertz, Carla M Baxter, Michael Ondras, Paula L Kip, Graham M Snyder and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Artificial intelligence in antimicrobial stewardship: a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive performance and diagnostic accuracy.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jansen N Seheult *Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6850-7495
Michelle N Stram *Department of Forensic Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9956-9453
Lydia ContisDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Raymond E PontzerInfection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Stephanie HardyLaboratory Service Center, UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
William WertzLaboratory Service Center, UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Carla M BaxterWolff Center, UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Michael OndrasLaboratory Service Center, UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Paula L KipWolff Center, UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8337-4777
Graham M SnyderInfection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5562-8880
A William PasculleDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5540-2056

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PittUDT, a recursive partitioning decision tree algorithm for predicting urine culture (UC) positivity based on macroscopic and microscopic urinalysis (UA) parameters, was developed in support of a broader system-wide diagnostic stewardship initiative to increase appropriateness of UC testing. Reflex algorithm training utilized results from 19,511 paired UA and UC cases (26.8% UC positive); the average patient age was 57.4 years, and 70% of samples were from female patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified urine white blood cells (WBCs), leukocyte esterase, and bacteria as the best predictors of UC positivity, with areas under the ROC curve of 0.79, 0.78, and 0.77, respectively. Using the held-out test data set (9,773 cases; 26.3% UC positive), the PittUDT algorithm met the prespecified target of a negative predictive value above 90% and resulted in a 30 to 60% total negative proportion (true-negative plus false-negative predictions). These data show that a supervised rule-based machine learning algorithm trained on paired UA and UC data has adequate predictive ability for triaging urine specimens by identifying low-risk urine specimens, which are unlikely to grow pathogenic organisms, with a false-negative proportion under 5%. The decision tree approach also generates human-readable rules that can be easily implemented across multiple hospital sites and settings. Our work demonstrates how a data-driven approach can be used to optimize UA parameters for predicting UC positivity in a reflex protocol, with the intent of improving antimicrobial stewardship and UC utilization, a potential avenue for cost savings.

Indexed as

Urinary Tract InfectionsDecision TreesHumansMachine LearningMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveUrinalysisUrinemachine learningPittUDT algorithmreceiver operating characteristicreflex protocolurine culture

Identifiers

PMID37227272
PMCPMC10281150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.