Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37227124›Full record

ArticleThe Laryngoscope2023

Preclinical Models of Laryngeal Papillomavirus Infection: A Scoping Review.

Renee E King, Andrea Bilger, Josef Rademacher, Paul F Lambert, Susan L Thibeault

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The Laryngoscope, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Renee E KingMcArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-6540-3834
Andrea BilgerMcArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-4838-4731
Josef RademacherDivision of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.ORCID 0009-0007-7594-5104
Paul F LambertMcArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0001-7983-2755
Susan L ThibeaultDivision of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-9046-4356
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Visualizing EBV and HCMV DNA Dynamics During InfectionP01CA022443 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Paul F. Lambert · 1985 to 2026
$53.1M
Engineering the Vocal Fold MucosaR01DC004336 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Susan Lynn Thibeault · 2000 to 2026
$14.6M
Defining Drivers of HPV-associated CarcinogenesisR35CA210807 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Paul F. Lambert · 2017 to 2026
$9.2M
UW Surgical Oncology Research Training Program (UW-SORT)T32CA090217 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Muhammed Murtaza, Heather B Neuman · 2001 to 2026
$8.3M
University of Wisconsin Voice Research Training Program (T32)T32DC009401 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Susan Lynn Thibeault · 2009 to 2026
$6.3M
Vocal fold epithelial barrier and proliferation in laryngeal papillomatosisF31DC018184 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KING, RENEE · 2019 to 2021
$73k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA022443NCI NIH HHS R35 CA210807NCI NIH HHS T32 CA090217NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC018184NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004336NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC009401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLaryngeal human papillomavirus (HPV) infection causes recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) and accounts for up to 25% of laryngeal cancers. Lack of satisfactory preclinical models is one reason that treatments for these diseases are limited. We sought to assess the literature describing preclinical models of laryngeal papillomavirus infection. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from the inception of database through October 2022. REVIEW

methodsStudies searched were screened by two investigators. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed, published in English, presented original data, and described attempted models of laryngeal papillomavirus infection. Data examined included type of papillomavirus, infection model, and results including success rate, disease phenotype, and viral retention.

resultsAfter screening 440 citations and 138 full-text studies, 77 studies published between 1923 and 2022 were included. Models used low-risk HPV or RRP (n = 51 studies), high-risk HPV or laryngeal cancer (n = 16), both low- and high-risk HPV (n = 1), and animal papillomaviruses (n = 9). For RRP, 2D and 3D cell culture models and xenografts retained disease phenotypes and HPV DNA in the short term. Two laryngeal cancer cell lines were consistently HPV-positive in multiple studies. Animal laryngeal infections with animal papillomaviruses resulted in disease and long-term retention of viral DNA.

conclusionsLaryngeal papillomavirus infection models have been researched for 100 years and primarily involve low-risk HPV. Most models lose viral DNA after a short duration. Future work is needed to model persistent and recurrent diseases, consistent with RRP and HPV-positive laryngeal cancer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 133:3256-3268, 2023.

Indexed as

Laryngeal NeoplasmsLarynxPapillomavirus InfectionsRespiratory Tract InfectionsDNA, ViralHuman papillomavirus 11HumansPapillomaviridaeDNA, Viralanimal modelcell culturelarynxpapillomavirusxenograft

Identifiers

PMID37227124
PMCPMC10674042
OpenAlexW4378173557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.