Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37227115›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

Optimizing the design and implementation of question prompt lists to support person-centred care: A scoping review.

Jessica U Ramlakhan, Shazia Dhanani, Whitney B Berta, Anna R Gagliardi

Erratum issuedAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development of a Patient Question Prompt List for Older Adults with Early-Stage Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Co-Design of Maternity Discussion Cards for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluation of a Question Prompt List About Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Prevention After Hypertensive Pregnancy: A Pilot Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Optimizing the design and implementation of question prompt lists to support person-centred care: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica U RamlakhanToronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Shazia DhananiToronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Whitney B BertaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Anna R GagliardiToronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5721-809X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionQuestion prompt lists (QPLs) are lists of questions that patients may want to discuss with clinicians. QPLs support person-centred care and have been associated with many beneficial outcomes including improved patient question-asking, and the amount and quality of the information provided by clinicians. The purpose of this study was to review published research on QPLs to explore how QPL design and implementation can be optimized.

methodsWe performed a scoping review by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Joanna Briggs Database from inception to 8 May 2022, for English language studies of any design that evaluated QPLs. We used summary statistics and text to report study characteristics, and QPL design and implementation.

resultsWe included 57 studies published from 1988 to 2022 by authors in 12 countries on a range of clinical topics. Of those, 56% provided the QPL, but few described how QPLs were developed. The number of questions varied widely (range 9-191). Most QPLs were single-page handouts (44%) but others ranged from 2 to 33 pages. Most studies implemented a QPL alone with no other accompanying strategy; most often in a print format before consultations by mail (18%) or in the waiting room (66%). Both patients and clinicians identified numerous benefits to patients of QPLs (e.g., increased patient confidence to ask questions, and patient satisfaction with communication or care received; and reduced anxiety about health status or treatment). To support use, patients desired access to QPLs in advance of clinician visits, and clinicians desired information/training on how to use the QPL and answer questions. Most (88%) studies reported at least one beneficial impact of QPLs. This was true even for single-page QPLs with few questions unaccompanied by other implementation strategies. Despite favourable views of QPLs, few studies assessed outcomes amongst clinicians.

conclusionThis review identified QPL characteristics and implementation strategies that may be associated with beneficial outcomes. Future research should confirm these findings via systematic review and explore the benefits of QPLs from the clinician's perspective. PATIENT/PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Following this review, we used the findings to develop a QPL on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and interviewed women and clinicians about QPL design including content, format, enablers and barriers of use, and potential outcomes including beneficial impacts and possible harms (will be published elsewhere).

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsCommunicationFemaleHumansPatient-Centered CareSurveys and Questionnairespatient-clinician communicationperson-centred carequestion prompt listscoping review

Identifiers

PMID37227115
PMCPMC10349246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.