ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023
Optimizing the design and implementation of question prompt lists to support person-centred care: A scoping review.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of structured checklist-assisted multimedia interactive education on postoperative pain management and quality of life in patients with lower extremity varicose veins: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.Frontiers in public health · 2026Trial
- Collaborative safety: The impact of patient and caregiver engagement in perioperative care.PEC innovation · 2026Article
- Patient Preparation in Walk-in Clinics Through the Implementation of a Consultation Preparation Sheet: Qualitative Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
- Bridging the difficult talk: dentists' perception of a patient-centred communication aid to improve oral cancer early detection.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Development of a question prompt list to support Consent for Genomic Testing (CoGenT) and research.Human genetics · 2026Article
- Development of a Patient Question Prompt List for Older Adults with Early-Stage Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Labels, Language and Other Strategies to Improve Communication About Lowest Grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Qualitative Interviews With Women and Physicians.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- An updated framework for task shifting and sharing: refining the SHIFT-SHARE based on stakeholder feedback from India.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Development of a novel person-centered question prompt list to talk with your pharmacists in Japanese community pharmacies: focus group and Delphi method.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2025Article
- Usability and feasibility of ADappt: a digital toolkit to support communication on diagnosis and prognosis in memory clinics.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- Co-Design of Maternity Discussion Cards for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Use of the Survivors' Unmet Needs Survey (SUNS) Framework to Understand the Needs of Colorectal Cancer Survivors in Thailand: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Patient Evaluations of a Question Prompt List for Danish-Speaking Patients at the Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Odense University Hospital.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Development of a generic decision guide for patients in oncology: a qualitative interview study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Facilitating active participation in anticoagulant decisions in advanced kidney disease: co-production of a question prompt list.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a Question Prompt List About Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Prevention After Hypertensive Pregnancy: A Pilot Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Adapting and Validating a Patient Prompt List to Assist Localized Prostate Cancer Patients with Treatment Decision Making.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Facilitating patient-oncologist communication in advanced treatment-resistant cancer: development and feasibility testing of a question prompt list.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2024Article
- Implementation of Obesity Science Into Clinical Practice: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2024Review
- Optimizing the design and implementation of question prompt lists to support person-centred care: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionQuestion prompt lists (QPLs) are lists of questions that patients may want to discuss with clinicians. QPLs support person-centred care and have been associated with many beneficial outcomes including improved patient question-asking, and the amount and quality of the information provided by clinicians. The purpose of this study was to review published research on QPLs to explore how QPL design and implementation can be optimized.
methodsWe performed a scoping review by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Joanna Briggs Database from inception to 8 May 2022, for English language studies of any design that evaluated QPLs. We used summary statistics and text to report study characteristics, and QPL design and implementation.
resultsWe included 57 studies published from 1988 to 2022 by authors in 12 countries on a range of clinical topics. Of those, 56% provided the QPL, but few described how QPLs were developed. The number of questions varied widely (range 9-191). Most QPLs were single-page handouts (44%) but others ranged from 2 to 33 pages. Most studies implemented a QPL alone with no other accompanying strategy; most often in a print format before consultations by mail (18%) or in the waiting room (66%). Both patients and clinicians identified numerous benefits to patients of QPLs (e.g., increased patient confidence to ask questions, and patient satisfaction with communication or care received; and reduced anxiety about health status or treatment). To support use, patients desired access to QPLs in advance of clinician visits, and clinicians desired information/training on how to use the QPL and answer questions. Most (88%) studies reported at least one beneficial impact of QPLs. This was true even for single-page QPLs with few questions unaccompanied by other implementation strategies. Despite favourable views of QPLs, few studies assessed outcomes amongst clinicians.
conclusionThis review identified QPL characteristics and implementation strategies that may be associated with beneficial outcomes. Future research should confirm these findings via systematic review and explore the benefits of QPLs from the clinician's perspective. PATIENT/PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Following this review, we used the findings to develop a QPL on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and interviewed women and clinicians about QPL design including content, format, enablers and barriers of use, and potential outcomes including beneficial impacts and possible harms (will be published elsewhere).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.