Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37226901›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse

Buprenorphine Prescribing and Dosing Limits: Evidence and Policy Goals.

David Tyler Coyle, Stephanie Stewart, Cole Bortz, Jane Manalo, Alexis Ritvo, Martin Krsak

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David Tyler CoyleUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Stephanie StewartUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Cole BortzUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jane ManaloUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Alexis RitvoUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Martin KrsakUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The opioid misuse epidemic is a serious public health crisis. Opioid-involved deaths continue to rise and the potency of illicitly manufactured synthetic opioids has increased, creating challenges for the healthcare system to provide multifaceted specialized care. Elements of the regulation around buprenorphine, 1 of 3 drugs approved to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), constrain treatment options for patients and providers alike. Updates to this regulatory framework, particularly around dosing and access to care, would enable providers to better treat the changing landscape of opioid misuse. Specific actions to this end are to: (1) Increase buprenorphine dosing flexibility based on FDA labeling which drives payor policies; (2) Restrict local government and institutional impositions of arbitrary access and dosing limits for buprenorphine; and (3) Liberalize buprenorphine initiation and maintenance via telemedicine for OUD.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidGoalsHumansPolicyAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineBuprenorphineOpioidsPolicy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.