Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37226846›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2023

Development and Validation of Prediction Models and Risk Calculators for Posthepatectomy Liver Failure and Postoperative Complications Using a Diverse International Cohort of Major Hepatectomies.

Jaeyun J Wang, Jean Feng, Camilla Gomes, Lucia Calthorpe, Amir Ashraf Ganjouei, Fernanda Romero-Hernandez, Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra, Taizo Hibi, Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam, Adnan Alseidi and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Risk stratification prior to major hepatectomy.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Jaeyun J WangDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Jean FengDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Camilla GomesDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Lucia CalthorpeDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Amir Ashraf GanjoueiDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Fernanda Romero-HernandezDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Andrea Benedetti CacciaguerraDepartment of General Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Taizo HibiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan.
Mohamed Abdelgadir AdamDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Adnan AlseidiDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Mohammad Abu HilalDepartment of General Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Nikdokht RashidianDepartment of General, HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2654-4447
International Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure Study Group
University of California, San Francisco · USFondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero · ITFund for Scientific Research · BEGhent University Hospital · BEKumamoto University · JPMarche Polytechnic University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study aim was to develop and validate models to predict clinically significant posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and serious complications [a Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)>40] using preoperative and intraoperative variables.

backgroundPHLF is a serious complication after major hepatectomy but does not comprehensively capture a patient's postoperative course. Adding the CCI as an additional metric can account for complications unrelated to liver function.

methodsThe cohort included adult patients who underwent major hepatectomies at 12 international centers (2010-2020). After splitting the data into training and validation sets (70:30), models for PHLF and a CCI>40 were fit using logistic regression with a lasso penalty on the training cohort. The models were then evaluated on the validation data set.

resultsAmong 2192 patients, 185 (8.4%) had clinically significant PHLF and 160 (7.3%) had a CCI>40. The PHLF model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80, calibration slope of 0.95, and calibration-in-the-large of -0.09, while the CCI model had an AUC of 0.76, calibration slope of 0.88, and calibration-in-the-large of 0.02. When the models were provided only preoperative variables to predict PHLF and a CCI>40, this resulted in similar AUCs of 0.78 and 0.71, respectively. Both models were used to build 2 risk calculators with the option to include or exclude intraoperative variables ( PHLF Risk Calculator; CCI>40 Risk Calculator ).

conclusionsUsing an international cohort of major hepatectomy patients, we used preoperative and intraoperative variables to develop and internally validate multivariable models to predict clinically significant PHLF and a CCI>40 with good discrimination and calibration.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver FailureLiver NeoplasmsAdultHepatectomyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37226846
OpenAlexW4378172318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.