Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37226443›Full record

ReviewPlant communications2023

From the floret to the canopy: High temperature tolerance during flowering.

Mayang Liu, Yuhan Zhou, Jiaxin Sun, Fen Mao, Qian Yao, Baole Li, Yuanyuan Wang, Yingbo Gao, Xin Dong, Shuhua Liao and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. ExploringPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mayang LiuCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Yuhan ZhouCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Jiaxin SunCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Fen MaoCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Qian YaoCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Baole LiCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Yuanyuan WangCollege of Agronomy, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong, China.
Yingbo GaoShandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China.
Xin DongChongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing, China.
Shuhua LiaoCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Pu WangCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Shoubing HuangCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China. Electronic address: huangshoubing@cau.edu.cn.
China Agricultural University · CNChongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNShandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNSouth China Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heat waves induced by climate warming have become common in food-producing regions worldwide, frequently coinciding with high temperature (HT)-sensitive stages of many crops and thus threatening global food security. Understanding the HT sensitivity of reproductive organs is currently of great interest for increasing seed set. The responses of seed set to HT involve multiple processes in both male and female reproductive organs, but we currently lack an integrated and systematic summary of these responses for the world's three leading food crops (rice, wheat, and maize). In the present work, we define the critical high temperature thresholds for seed set in rice (37.2°C ± 0.2°C), wheat (27.3°C ± 0.5°C), and maize (37.9°C ± 0.4°C) during flowering. We assess the HT sensitivity of these three cereals from the microspore stage to the lag period, including effects of HT on flowering dynamics, floret growth and development, pollination, and fertilization. Our review synthesizes existing knowledge about the effects of HT stress on spikelet opening, anther dehiscence, pollen shedding number, pollen viability, pistil and stigma function, pollen germination on the stigma, and pollen tube elongation. HT-induced spikelet closure and arrest of pollen tube elongation have a catastrophic effect on pollination and fertilization in maize. Rice benefits from pollination under HT stress owing to bottom anther dehiscence and cleistogamy. Cleistogamy and secondary spikelet opening increase the probability of pollination success in wheat under HT stress. However, cereal crops themselves also have protective measures under HT stress. Lower canopy/tissue temperatures compared with air temperatures indicate that cereal crops, especially rice, can partly protect themselves from heat damage. In maize, husk leaves reduce inner ear temperature by about 5°C compared with outer ear temperature, thereby protecting the later phases of pollen tube growth and fertilization processes. These findings have important implications for accurate modeling, optimized crop management, and breeding of new varieties to cope with HT stress in the most important staple crops.

Indexed as

Edible GrainPollinationCrops, AgriculturalHot TemperatureSeedsTemperaturefloret organsflowering patternhigh temperaturepollinationseed set

Identifiers

PMID37226443
PMCPMC10721465
OpenAlexW4377691662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.