ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025
Optimization of collateral grading on computer tomography angiography.
Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram incorporating automated collateral score and computed tomography perfusion parameters for patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundAs compared to single-phase CTA (sCTA), multi-phase CTA (mCTA) has been shown to more accurately estimate collateral flow in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We sought to determine the characterization of poor collaterals across the three different phases of the mCTA. We also attempted to establish the optimal arterio-venous contrast timing parameters on sCTA that would prevent false positive reads of poor collateral status.MethodsWe retrospectively screened consecutive patients admitted for possible thrombectomy from February 2018 to June 2019. Only cases with intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) or main trunk of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion and both baseline mCTA and CT Perfusion available were included. Mean Hounsfield units (HU) of torcula and torcula/patent ICA ratio were used for the arterio-venous timing analysis.ResultsOf the 105 patients included, 35 (34%) received IV-tPA treatment and 65 (61.9%) underwent mechanical thrombectomy. A total of 20 patients (19%) had poor collaterals on the third-phase CTA (ground-truth). The first-phase CTA often underestimated collateral score (37/105 [35%], p < 0.01), however there were no significant differences across the second- and third-phases (5/105[5%], p = 0.06. Venous opacification Youden's J point for identifying suboptimal sCTAs was found to be 207.9HU in the torcula (65% sensitivity,65% specificity) and 66.74% for torcula/patent ICA ratio (51% sensitivity,73% specificity).ConclusionA dual-phase CTA is significantly similar to a mCTA assessment of collateral score and may be applied at community-based centers. Absolute or relative thresholds for torcula opacification may be used to identify poor bolus-scan timing thus preventing erroneous assumptions of poor collaterals on sCTA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.