Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37226382›Full record

ArticleAsian spine journal2023

A New Clinical Tool for Scoliosis Risk Analysis: Scoliosis Tele-Screening Test.

Hurriyet Gursel Yılmaz, Ahsen Büyükaslan, Aslihan Kuşvuran, Zeynep Turan, Filiz Tuna, Hande Tunc, Sibel Özdoğan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian spine journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Repeatability and intra and interrater reproducibility of the DIPA-S eHealth© capture and analysis system for clinical assessment of scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Hurriyet Gursel YılmazFormed Healthcare Scoliosis Treatment and Brace Center, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ahsen BüyükaslanFormed Healthcare Scoliosis Treatment and Brace Center, Istanbul, Turkey.
Aslihan KuşvuranDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Toros University, Mersin, Turkey.
Zeynep TuranDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Filiz TunaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey.
Hande TuncFormed Healthcare Scoliosis Treatment and Brace Center, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sibel ÖzdoğanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medstar Antalya Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Antalya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRIstanbul Medipol University · TRKoç University · TRToros University · TRTrakya University · TRUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designMethodological, observational clinical study. PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a virtual screening test to detect scoliosis risk initially by parents without the need for medical visit during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The scoliosis screening program has been implemented to early detect scoliosis. Unfortunately, access to health professionals was limited during the pandemic. However, during this time, interest in telemedicine has increased remarkably. Recently, mobile applications related to postural analysis were developed, but none permits evaluation by parents.

methodsResearchers developed the Scoliosis Tele-Screening Test (STS-Test), which included drawing-based images of body asymmetries, to assess the scoliosis-associated risk factors. The STS-Test was shared on social networks, allowing the parents to evaluate their children. After test completion, the risk score was generated automatically, and children with medium and high risks were then advised for medical consultation for further evaluation. The test accuracy and consistency between the clinician and parents were also analyzed.

resultsOf the 865 tested children, 358 (41.4%) consulted clinicians to confirm their STS-Test results. Scoliosis was then confirmed in 91 children (25.4%). The parents were able to detect asymmetry in 50% of the lumbar/thoracolumbar curvatures and 82% of the thoracic curvatures. In addition, the forward bend test revealed favorable agreement between parents and clinicians (r =0.809, p<0.0005). Internal consistency of the esthetic deformities domain in the STS-Test was also excellent (α=0.901). This tool was 94.97% accurate, 83.51% sensitive, and 98.87% specific.

conclusionsThe STS-Test is a new parent-friendly, virtual, cost-effective, result-oriented, and reliable tool for scoliosis screening. It allows parents to actively participate in the early detection of scoliosis by screening their children for the risk of scoliosis periodically without the need to visit the health institution.

Indexed as

PostureRemote examinationScoliosisScoliosis screeningTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37226382
PMCPMC10460665
OpenAlexW4378172200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.