Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37226273›Full record

SynthesisSystematic reviews2023

Effectiveness of worksite wellness programs based on physical activity to improve workers' health and productivity: a systematic review.

Maria Marin-Farrona, Brad Wipfli, Saurabh S Thosar, Enrique Colino, Jorge Garcia-Unanue, Leonor Gallardo, Jose Luis Felipe, Jorge López-Fernández

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria Marin-FarronaIGOID Research Group, Department of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071, Toledo, Spain.
Brad WipfliOHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Portland State University, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Saurabh S ThosarOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Enrique ColinoExercise and Sport Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Ctra. Pozuelo-Majadahonda Km 1,800, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28223, Madrid, Spain.
Jorge Garcia-UnanueIGOID Research Group, Department of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071, Toledo, Spain.
Leonor GallardoIGOID Research Group, Department of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071, Toledo, Spain.
Jose Luis FelipeIGOID Research Group, Department of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071, Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2029-1277
Jorge López-FernándezFaculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Calle Tajo S/N, Villaviciosa de Odón, 28670, Madrid, Spain. jorge.lopez@universidadeuropea.es.

Funding

NIOSH CDC HHS U19 OH010154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the scientific literature has previously described the impact of worksite programs based on physical activity (WPPAs) on employees' productivity and health in different contexts, the effect of these programs has not been analyzed based on the characteristics or modalities of physical activity (PA) performed (e.g., aerobic exercise, strength training, flexibility). In addition, studies on WPPAs usually report health and productivity outcomes separately, not integrated into a single study. Knowing the health and economic-related impacts of a WPPAs could provide useful information for stakeholders and policy development.

objectiveThe purpose of this review was as follows: (1) to analyze the effect of different modalities of WPPAs on employees' productivity and health and (2) to investigate the economic impact of WPPAs.

methodsThis systematic review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021230626) and complies with PRISMA guidelines. Only randomized controlled trials from 1997 to March 2021 were included. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts for study eligibility, extracted the data, and performed a quality assessment using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk-of-Bias Tool for randomized trials. Population, instruments, comparison, and outcome (PICO) elements were used to define eligibility criteria. Eight-hundred sixty relevant studies were found through electronic searches in PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases. Once the eligibility criteria were applied, a total of 16 papers were included.

resultsWorkability was the productivity variable most positively impacted by WPPAs. Cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, and musculoskeletal symptoms health variables improved in all the studies included. It was not possible to fully examine the effectiveness of each exercise modality because of the heterogeneity in methodology, duration, and working population. Finally, cost-effectiveness could not be analyzed because this information was not reported in most studies.

conclusionAll types of WPPAs analyzed improved workers' productivity and health. However, the heterogeneity of WPPAs does not allow to identify which modality is more effective.

Indexed as

Cardiorespiratory FitnessWorkplaceDatabases, FactualExerciseHealth PromotionHumansCardiorespiratoryCompanyEmployeeExerciseOccupational health and safetyWork-ability

Identifiers

PMID37226273
PMCPMC10207792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.