Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37226125›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

How the COVID-19 pandemic affects the moral reasoning of pediatric residents and the general population.

M G Jean-Tron, D Ávila-Montiel, Titto C Hill-de, H Márquez-González, G Chapa-Koloffon, A V Ávila-Hernández, M A Núñez-Benítez, O Muñoz-Hernández, J Garduño-Espinosa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M G Jean-TronHospital Infantil Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.
D Ávila-MontielHospital Infantil Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Titto C Hill-deHospital Infantil Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.
H Márquez-GonzálezHospital Infantil Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.
G Chapa-KoloffonHospital Infantil Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.
A V Ávila-HernándezHospital Infantil Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.
M A Núñez-BenítezMexican Social Security Institute, Mexico City, Mexico.
O Muñoz-HernándezHospital Infantil Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.
J Garduño-EspinosaHospital Infantil Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico. dilemasmorales20@gmail.com.
Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez · MXMexican Social Security Institute · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKohlberg's theory of moral development asserts that people progress through different stages of moral reasoning as their cognitive abilities and social interactions mature. Individuals at the lowest stage of moral reasoning (preconventional stage) judge moral issues based on self-interest, those with a medium stage (conventional stage) judge them based on compliance with rules and norms, and those at the highest stage (postconventional stage) judge moral issues based on universal principles and shared ideals. Upon attaining adulthood, it can be considered that there is stability in the stage of individuals' moral development; however, the effect of a global population crisis such as the one experienced in March 2020, when the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 pandemic, is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in the moral reasoning of pediatric residents before and after one year of the COVID-19 pandemic and compare them with a general population group.

methodsThis is a naturalistic quasi-experimental study conducted with two groups, one comprised 47 pediatric residents of a tertiary hospital converted into a COVID hospital during the pandemic and another group comprised 47 beneficiaries of a family clinic who were not health workers. The defining issues test (DIT) was applied to the 94 participants during March 2020, before the pandemic initiated in Mexico, and later during March 2021. To assess intragroup changes, the McNemar-Bowker and Wilcoxon tests were used.

resultsPediatric residents showed higher baseline stages of moral reasoning: 53% in the postconventional group compared to the general population group (7%). In the preconventional group, 23% were residents and 64% belonged to the general population. In the second measurement, one year after the start of the pandemic, the group of residents had a significant decrease of 13 points in the P index, unlike the general population group in which a decrease of 3 points was observed. This decrease however, did not equalize baseline stages. Pediatric residents remained 10 points higher than the general population group. Moral reasoning stages were associated with age and educational stage.

conclusionsAfter a year of the COVID-19 pandemic, we found a decrease in the stage of moral reasoning development in pediatric residents of a hospital converted for the care of patients with COVID-19, while it remained stable in the general population group. Physicians showed higher stages of moral reasoning at baseline than the general population.

Indexed as

COVID-19Population GroupsAdultChildHumansMoral DevelopmentMoralsPandemicsJudmentsKohlberg’s theoryMoral developmentMoralityMoral reasoning

Identifiers

PMID37226125
PMCPMC10208179
OpenAlexW4377982566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.