Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37226121›Full record

SynthesisBMC emergency medicine2023

Systematic review on the current state of disaster preparation Simulation Exercises (SimEx).

Syed Sarosh Mahdi, Hafsa Abrar Jafri, Raheel Allana, Gopi Battineni, Mariam Khawaja, Syeda Sakina, Daniyal Agha, Kiran Rehman, Francesco Amenta

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Primary health care research & development · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Syed Sarosh MahdiJinnah Medical and Dental College, Department of Community Dentistry, Sohail University, Karachi, Pakistan. syedsarosh.mahdi@unicam.it.
Hafsa Abrar JafriJinnah Medical and Dental College, Department of Community Dentistry, Sohail University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Raheel AllanaDepartment of Paediatrics & Child Health, Aga Khan University Karachi, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan.
Gopi BattineniClinical research centre, School of Medicinal and Health Products Sciences, University of Camerino, Camerino, 62032, Italy.
Mariam KhawajaJinnah Medical and Dental College, Department of Community Dentistry, Sohail University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Syeda SakinaSociology department, University of North Texas, Denton, TX76203, USA.
Daniyal AghaJinnah Medical and Dental College, Department of Community Dentistry, Sohail University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Kiran RehmanDivision of Restorative Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Francesco AmentaClinical research centre, School of Medicinal and Health Products Sciences, University of Camerino, Camerino, 62032, Italy.
Jinnah Medical & Dental College · PKSohail UniversityUniversità di Camerino · ITAga Khan University · PKInternational Medical University · MYUniversity of North Texas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe simulation exercise (SimEx) simulates an emergency in which an elaboration or description of the response is applied. The purpose of these exercises is to validate and improve plans, procedures, and systems for responding to all hazards. The purpose of this study was to review disaster preparation exercises conducted by various national, non-government, and academic institutions. METHODOLOGY: Several databases, including PubMed (Medline), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), BioMed Central, and Google Scholar, were used to review the literature. Information was retrieved using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and documents were selected according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). To assess the quality of the selected articles, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) technique was utilized.

resultsA total of 29 papers were selected for final review based on PRISMA guidelines and the NOS quality assessment. Studies have shown that many forms of SimEx commonly used in disaster management including tabletop exercises, functional exercises, and full-scale exercises have their benefits and limitations. There is no doubt that SimEx is an excellent tool for improving disaster planning and response. It is still necessary to give SimEx programs a more rigorous evaluation and to standardize the processes more thoroughly.

conclusionsDrills and training can be improved for disaster management, which will enable medical professionals to face the challenges of disaster management in the 21st century.

Indexed as

Disaster PlanningDisastersDatabases, FactualEmotionsHumansSchoolsDisaster drillsDisaster preparednessEmergency responseMass Casualty Exercise (MCI)SimEx

Identifiers

PMID37226121
PMCPMC10206538
OpenAlexW4378173423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.