Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37226089›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2023

Comparison of vasoactive-inotropic score, vasoactive-ventilation-renal score, and modified vasoactive-ventilation-renal score for predicting the poor prognosis after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Yanping Du, Wensu Li, Qingjuan Chen, Haichuan Shi, Qiong Li, Chunying Zhang, Yunxu Zhuang, Junying Li, Li Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanping DuDepartment of Cardiac Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, No.89 Guhuai Road, Rencheng District, 272000, Jining, P.R. China.
Wensu LiDepartment of Cardiac Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, No.89 Guhuai Road, Rencheng District, 272000, Jining, P.R. China.
Qingjuan ChenDepartment of Cardiac Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, No.89 Guhuai Road, Rencheng District, 272000, Jining, P.R. China.
Haichuan ShiDepartment of Cardiac Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, No.89 Guhuai Road, Rencheng District, 272000, Jining, P.R. China.
Qiong LiDepartment of Cardiac Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, No.89 Guhuai Road, Rencheng District, 272000, Jining, P.R. China.
Chunying ZhangDepartment of Cardiac Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, No.89 Guhuai Road, Rencheng District, 272000, Jining, P.R. China.
Yunxu ZhuangDepartment of Cardiac Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, No.89 Guhuai Road, Rencheng District, 272000, Jining, P.R. China.
Junying LiDepartment of Cardiac Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, No.89 Guhuai Road, Rencheng District, 272000, Jining, P.R. China.
Li TangDepartment of Cardiac Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, No.89 Guhuai Road, Rencheng District, 272000, Jining, P.R. China. tlhh2011@126.com.
Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExploring reliable prediction scoring systems is valuable for the poor prognosis of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Herein, we explored and compared the predictive performance of vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS), vasoactive-ventilation-renal (VVR) score, and modified VVR (M-VVR) score in the poor prognosis of patients undergoing CABG.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed in Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, and data of 537 patients were collected from January 2019 to May 2021. The independent variables were VIS, VVR, and M-VVR. Study endpoint of interest was the poor prognosis. Association between VIS, VVR, M-VVR and poor prognosis was assessed using logistic regression analysis, and odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. The performance of VIS, VVR, and M-VVR to predict the poor prognosis was assessed by calculating the area under the curve (AUC), and differences of the AUC of the three scoring systems were compared using DeLong test.

resultsAfter adjusting gender, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, surgery methods, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), VIS (OR: 1.09, 95%CI: 1.05-1.13) and M-VVR (OR: 1.09, 95%CI: 1.06-1.12) were associated with the increased odds of poor prognosis. The AUC of M-VVR, VVR, and VIS was 0.720 (95%CI: 0.668-0.771), 0.621 (95%CI: 0.566-0.677), and 0.685 (95%CI: 0.631-0.739), respectively. DeLong test displayed that the performance of M-VVR was better than VVR (P = 0.004) and VIS (P = 0.003).

conclusionsOur study found the good prediction performance of M-VVR for the poor prognosis of patients undergoing CABG, indicating that M-VVR may be a useful prediction index in the clinic.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassVentricular Function, LeftHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesStroke VolumeCoronary artery bypass graftingM-VVRPoor prognosisVISVVR

Identifiers

PMID37226089
PMCPMC10210316
OpenAlexW4378070490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.