Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37225979›Full record

ArticleNature2023

Users choose to engage with more partisan news than they are exposed to on Google Search.

Ronald E Robertson, Jon Green, Damian J Ruck, Katherine Ognyanova, Christo Wilson, David Lazer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Susceptibility to online misinformation: A systematic meta-analysis of demographic and psychological factors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Short-term exposure to filter-bubble recommendation systems has limited polarization effects: Naturalistic experiments on YouTube.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Challenges in Understanding Human-Algorithm Entanglement During Online Information Consumption.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
  17. Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Review
  18. Causally estimating the effect of YouTube's recommender system using counterfactual bots.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Machine culture.Nature human behaviour · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ronald E RobertsonStanford University, Stanford Internet Observatory, Stanford, CA, USA. rer@acm.org.ORCID 0000-0003-4525-5050
Jon GreenNortheastern University, Network Science Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Damian J RuckNortheastern University, Network Science Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Katherine OgnyanovaRutgers University, School of Communication & Information, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Christo WilsonNortheastern University, Network Science Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
David LazerNortheastern University, Network Science Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If popular online platforms systematically expose their users to partisan and unreliable news, they could potentially contribute to societal issues such as rising political polarization

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorInformation SourcesPoliticsPrejudiceSearch EngineAlgorithmsHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.