Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37225964›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2023

Bone marrow lesions: plugging the holes in our knowledge using animal models.

Rebecca T Hansen, Chantal Chenu, Nidhi Sofat, Andrew A Pitsillides

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Emerging therapies for knee osteoarthritis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca T HansenSkeletal Biology Group, Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4153-2145
Chantal ChenuSkeletal Biology Group, Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.
Nidhi SofatInstitute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6963-6475
Andrew A PitsillidesSkeletal Biology Group, Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK. apitsillides@rvc.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3861-998X
Royal Veterinary College · GBSt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

Versus Arthritis 21900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone marrow lesions (BMLs), which are early signs of osteoarthritis (OA) that are associated with the presence, onset and severity of pain, represent an emerging imaging biomarker and clinical target. Little is known, however, regarding their early spatial and temporal development, structural relationships or aetiopathogenesis, because of the sparsity of human early OA imaging and paucity of relevant tissue samples. The use of animal models is a logical approach to fill the gaps in our knowledge, and it can be informed by appraising models in which BMLs and closely related subchondral cysts have already been reported, including in spontaneous OA and pain models. The utility of these models in OA research, their relevance to clinical BMLs and practical considerations for their optimal deployment can also inform medical and veterinary clinicians and researchers alike.

Indexed as

Bone MarrowOsteoarthritis, KneeAnimalsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, AnimalPain

Identifiers

PMID37225964
OpenAlexW4377989332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.