Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37225958›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2023

Predicting Human Bioavailability of Subcutaneously Administered Monoclonal Antibodies Using Non-human Primate Linear Clearance and Antibody Isoelectric Point.

Peng Zou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peng ZouQuantitative Clinical Pharmacology, Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., 211 Mt. Airy Road, Basking Ridge, New Jersey, 07920, USA. pzou@dsi.com.
Daiichi Sankyo (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prediction of bioavailability is one of the major barriers in the clinical translation of subcutaneously (SC) administered therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) due to the lack of reliable in vitro and preclinical in vivo predictive models. Recently, multiple linear regression (MLR) models were developed to predict human SC bioavailability of mAbs using human linear clearance (CL) and isoelectric point (pI) of the whole antibody or Fv regions as independent variables. Unfortunately, these models cannot be applied to mAbs at the preclinical development stage because human CLs of these mAbs are unknown. In this study, we predicted human SC bioavailability of mAbs using preclinical data only by two approaches. In the first approach, allometric scaling was used to predict human linear CL from non-human primate (NHP) linear CL. The predicted human CL and the pI of the whole antibody or Fv regions were then incorporated into two previously published MLR models to predict the human bioavailability of 61 mAbs. In the second approach, two MLR models were developed using NHP linear CL and the pI of whole antibody or Fv regions of 41 mAbs in a training set. The two models were validated using an independent test dataset containing 20 mAbs. The four MLR models generated 77-85% of predictions within 0.8- to 1.2-fold deviations from observed human bioavailability. Overall, this study demonstrated that human SC bioavailability of mAbs at the preclinical stage could be predicted using NHP CL and pI of mAbs.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalPrimatesAnimalsBiological AvailabilityHumansIsoelectric PointKineticsAntibodies, Monoclonalhuman subcutaneous bioavailabilitymonkey clearancemultiple linear regressionprediction

Identifiers

PMID37225958
OpenAlexW4377968106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.