Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37225941›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2023

Neurological Pupil Index and Delayed Cerebral Ischemia after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Multicentric Study.

Elisa Gouvêa Bogossian, Aaron Blandino Ortiz, Valentina Esposito, Anselmo Caricato, Cassia Righy Shinotsuka, Berta Monléon Lopez, Giuseppina Giannì, Elisabetta Macchini, Raúl de Pablo Sanchez, Luca Pisapia and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Elisa Gouvêa Bogossian *Department of Intensive Care, Hopital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik, 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium. elisa.gouvea.bogossian@ulb.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2062-465X
Aaron Blandino Ortiz *Intensive Care Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Valentina EspositoDepartment of Intensive Care, Hopital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik, 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Anselmo CaricatoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Cassia Righy ShinotsukaDepartment of Neurointensive Care, Paulo Niemeyer State Brain Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Berta Monléon LopezDepartment of Anesthesiology and Surgical-Trauma Intensive Care, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Giuseppina GiannìDepartment of Intensive Care, Hopital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik, 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Elisabetta MacchiniDepartment of Intensive Care, Hopital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik, 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Raúl de Pablo SanchezIntensive Care Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Luca PisapiaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Ricardo TuronDepartment of Neurointensive Care, Paulo Niemeyer State Brain Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Bruno GonçalvesDepartment of Neurointensive Care, Paulo Niemeyer State Brain Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rafael BadenesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Surgical-Trauma Intensive Care, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Pedro KurtzDepartment of Neurointensive Care, Paulo Niemeyer State Brain Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Hopital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik, 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEInstituto Estadual do Cérebro Paulo Niemeyer · BRUniversidad de Alcalá · ESUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITD’Or Institute for Research and Education · BRHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) occurs in around 30% of patients suffering from nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and is associated with poor neurological outcome. Whether the Neurological Pupil index (NPi) derived from the automated pupillometry could help to diagnose the occurrence of DCI remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of NPi with the occurrence of DCI in patients with SAH.

methodsThis was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with SAH admitted to the intensive care units of five hospitals between January 2018 and December 2020 who underwent daily NPi recordings (every 8 h) during the first 10 days of admission. DCI was diagnosed according to standard definitions (in awake patients) or based on neuroimaging and neuromonitoring (in sedated or unconscious patients). An NPi < 3 was defined as abnormal. The primary outcome of the study was to assess the time course of daily NPi between patients with DCI and patients without DCI. Secondary outcome included the number of patients who had an NPi < 3 before DCI.

resultsA total of 210 patients were eligible for the final analysis; DCI occurred in 85 (41%) patients. Patients who developed DCI had similar values of mean and worst daily NPi over time when compared with patients without DCI. Patients with DCI had a higher proportion of at least one NPi < 3 at any moment before DCI when compared with others (39/85, 46% vs. 35/125, 38%, p = 0.009). Similarly, the worst NPi before DCI diagnosis was lower in the DCI group when compared with others (3.1 [2.5-3.8] vs. 3.7 [2.7-4.1], p = 0.05). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, the presence of NPi < 3 was not independently associated with the development of DCI (odds ratio 1.52 [95% confidence interval 0.80-2.88]).

conclusionsIn this study, NPi measured three times a day and derived from the automated pupillometry had a limited value for the diagnosis of DCI in patients with SAH.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaSubarachnoid HemorrhageVasospasm, IntracranialCerebral InfarctionHumansPupilRetrospective StudiesNeuromonitoringPupillary light reflexStrokeVasospasm

Identifiers

PMID37225941
OpenAlexW4377967944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.