Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37225935›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of colorectal disease2023

Robotic colorectal surgery in the emergent diverticulitis setting: is it safe? A review of large national database.

Karleigh R Curfman, Ian F Jones, Jeffrey R Conner, Christopher C Neighorn, Ryan K Wilson, Laila Rashidi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of colorectal disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Observational
  6. An Emergency Robotic Programme for Acute Complicated Diverticulitis: A Tertiary Centre Experience.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer emergencies.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karleigh R CurfmanMultiCare Health Network, Tacoma, WA, 98405, USA. karleighcurfman@gmail.com.
Ian F JonesMadigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA, 98431, USA.
Jeffrey R ConnerMadigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA, 98431, USA.
Christopher C NeighornIntuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, 94086, USA.
Ryan K WilsonIntuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, 94086, USA.
Laila RashidiMultiCare Health Network, Tacoma, WA, 98405, USA.
Intuitive Surgical (United States) · USMadigan Army Medical Center · USMultiCare Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs robotic colorectal surgery continues to advance in conjunction with improved recovery protocols, we began implementing robotic surgery (RS) as an option for emergent diverticulitis surgery. Our hospital system utilizes the Da Vinci Xi system, and staff are required to undergo training, making emergent colorectal surgery a feasible option. However, it is essential to determine the safety with reproducibility of our experiences.

methodsA de-identified retrospective review was performed of Intuitive's national database which obtained data from 262 facilities from January 2018 through December 2021. This identified over 22,000 emergent colorectal surgeries. Of those, over 2500 were performed for diverticulitis in which 126 were RS, 446 laparoscopic surgery (LS), and 1952 open surgery (OS). Clinical outcome metrics including conversion rates, anastomotic leaks, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, length of stay, mortality, and readmissions were obtained. The cohort was defined by patients who were seen in the emergency department (ED) with diverticulitis and proceeded to have a sigmoid colectomy within 24 h of ED arrival.

resultsRS was associated with increased operating time (RS 262, LS 207, OS 182 min), but data has shown many benefits of emergent RS compared to OS. We identified significant decreases in ICU admission rates (OS 19.0%, RS 9.5%, p = 0.01) and anastomotic leak rates (OS 4.4%, RS 0.8%, p = 0.04), with borderline improvement in overall length of stay (OS 9.9, RS 8.9 days, p = 0.05). When compared with LS, RS showed many comparable results. However, RS witnessed a statistically significant improvement in anastomotic leak rates (LS 4.5%, RS 0.8%, p = 0.04). Importantly, there was a striking difference in conversion rates to OS. LS converted over 28.7% of cases to OS, whereas RS only converted 7.9%, p = 0.000005.

conclusionGiven these findings, RS is another MIS tool that could be a safe and feasible option for the acute management of emergent diverticulitis.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgeryDiverticulitisRobotic Surgical ProceduresAnastomotic LeakHumansReproducibility of ResultsColectomyDiverticulitisEmergency surgeryRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID37225935
OpenAlexW4377965819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.