Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37225860›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2023

Phase II trial of delta-tocotrienol in neoadjuvant breast cancer with evaluation of treatment response using ctDNA.

Ina Mathilde Kjær, Søren Kahns, Signe Timm, Rikke Fredslund Andersen, Jonna Skov Madsen, Erik Hugger Jakobsen, Tomasz Piotr Tabor, Anders Jakobsen, Troels Bechmann

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Significance of Vitamins A and E in Cancer Progression and Prevention.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Circulating methylatedOncology letters · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ina Mathilde KjærDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark. ina.mathilde.kjaer@rsyd.dk.
Søren KahnsDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Signe TimmDepartment of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Rikke Fredslund AndersenDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Jonna Skov MadsenDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Erik Hugger JakobsenDepartment of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Tomasz Piotr TaborDepartment of Pathology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Anders JakobsenDepartment of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Troels BechmannDepartment of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Vejle Sygehus · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKRegional Hospital Central Jutland · DKRegional Hospital West Jutland · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer is applied to an increasing extent, but treatment response varies and side effects pose a challenge. The vitamin E isoform delta-tocotrienol might enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy and reduce the risk of side effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effect of delta-tocotrienol combined with standard neoadjuvant treatment and the possible association between detectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) during and after neoadjuvant treatment with pathological treatment response. This open-label, randomized phase II trial included 80 women with newly diagnosed, histologically verified breast cancer randomized to standard neoadjuvant treatment alone or in combination with delta-tocotrienol. There was no difference in the response rate or frequency of serious adverse events between the two arms. We developed a multiplex digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assay for the detection of ctDNA in breast cancer patients that targets a combination of two methylations specific for breast tissue (LMX1B and ZNF296) and one cancer specific methylation (HOXA9). The sensitivity of the assay increased when the cancer specific marker was combined with the ones specific to breast tissue (p < 0.001). The results did not show any association between ctDNA status and pathological treatment response, neither at midterm nor before surgery.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsBiological AssayFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyVitamin Etocotrienol, deltaVitamin E

Identifiers

PMID37225860
PMCPMC10209064
OpenAlexW4377983542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.