Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37225714›Full record

ReviewNPJ breast cancer2023

Liquid biopsy for brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease in patients with breast cancer.

Stefania Morganti, Heather A Parsons, Nancy U Lin, Albert Grinshpun

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ breast cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Focused ultrasound for brain metastases.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. CDK4/6 inhibitors for metastatic breast cancer in routine clinical practice in Spain: survey of patterns of use and oncologists' perceptions.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Molecular Underpinnings of Brain Metastases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefania MorgantiMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Heather A ParsonsMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Nancy U LinMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Albert GrinshpunMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. albert_grinshpun@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-5719
Broad Institute · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A significant subset of patients with metastatic breast cancer develops brain metastasis. As efficacy of systemic therapies has improved and patients live longer with metastatic breast cancer, the incidence of breast cancer brain metastases has increased. Brain metastases pose a clinical challenge in diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring across all breast cancer subtypes, and better tools are needed. Liquid biopsy, which enables minimally invasive sampling of a patient's cancer, has the potential to shed light on intra-cranial tumor biology and to improve patient care by enabling therapy tailoring. Here we review current evidence for the clinical validity of liquid biopsy in patients with breast cancer brain metastases, with a focus on circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA.

Identifiers

PMID37225714
PMCPMC10209176
OpenAlexW4378173190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.