Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37225266›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency versus dry needling for pain management in chronic neck and shoulder myofascial pain syndrome patients at a tertiary hospital in China: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

Jin Wang, Yuelun Zhang, Xulei Cui, Le Shen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05637047 (Ultrasound-guided Pulsed Radiofrequency Versus Dry Needling for Pain Management in Chronic Neck and Shoulder Myofascial Pain Patients at a Tertiary Hospital in China), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05637047 naunknown statusnot on this map

Ultrasound-guided Pulsed Radiofrequency Versus Dry Needling for Pain Management in Chronic Neck and Shoulder Myofascial Pain Patients at a Tertiary Hospital in China: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking Union Medical College HospitalRan2023 to 2025Enrolled108ConditionsMyofascial PainArmspulsed radiofrequency, Dry needling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jin Wang *Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0631-5196
Yuelun Zhang *Central Research Laboratory, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7990-9003
Xulei Cui *Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China cuixulei10685@pumch.cn pumchshenle@163.com.
Le Shen *Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Beijing, China cuixulei10685@pumch.cn pumchshenle@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2563-0012
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMyofascial pain syndrome (MPS), especially in the neck and shoulder region, is one of the most common chronic pain disorders worldwide. Dry needling (DN) and pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) are the two effective methods for treating MPS. We aimed to compare the effects of DN and PRF in chronic neck and shoulder MPS patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, single-centre, randomised, controlled trial in a tertiary hospital. We plan to recruit 108 patients aged 18-70 years who are diagnosed with chronic MPS in the neck, shoulder and upper back regions and randomly allocate them to either the DN or PRF group at a 1:1 ratio. The DN group will receive ultrasound-guided intramuscular and interfascial DN 8-10 times per pain point or until local twitch responses are no longer elicited and 30 min of indwelling. The PRF group will receive ultrasound-guided intramuscular (0.9% saline 2 mL, 42℃, 2 Hz, 2 min) and interfascial (0.9% saline 5 mL, 42℃, 2 Hz, 2 min) PRF. Follow-up will be performed by the research assistant at 0, 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The primary outcome is the postoperative 6-month pain visual analogue score (0-100 mm). Secondary outcomes include pressure pain threshold measured by an algometer, Neck Disability Index, depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7), sleep status (Likert scale) and overall quality of life (36-Item Short Form Survey). Between-group comparisons will be analysed using either a non-parametric test or a mixed effects linear model. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the medical ethics committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (JS-3399). All participants will give written informed consent before participation. The results from this study will be shared at conferences and disseminated in international journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05637047, Pre-results.

Indexed as

Dry NeedlingFibromyalgiaMyofascial Pain SyndromesPulsed Radiofrequency TreatmentChinaHumansPainPain ManagementProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSaline SolutionShoulderTertiary Care CentersUltrasonography, InterventionalSaline SolutionMusculoskeletal disordersPAIN MANAGEMENTREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID37225266
PMCPMC10230963
OpenAlexW4378172376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.