Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37224875›Full record

ArticleUltraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980)2023

Echogenicity of Brain Structures in Huntington's Disease Patients Evaluated by Transcranial Sonography - Magnetic Resonance Fusion Imaging using Virtual Navigator and Digital Image Analysis.

Jiří Kozel, David Školoudík, Pavel Ressner, Patricie Michalčová, Petr Dušek, Pavla Hanzlíková, Nina Dvořáčková, Tomáš Heryán, Petra Bártová

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jiří KozelCenter for Health Research, University of Ostrava Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-4678-8043
David ŠkoloudíkCenter for Health Research, University of Ostrava Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2651-3424
Pavel RessnerNeurology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.
Patricie MichalčováCenter for Health Research, University of Ostrava Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Petr DušekNeurology, The First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic.
Pavla HanzlíkováRadiodiagnostics, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Nina DvořáčkováMedical Genetics, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Tomáš HeryánCenter for Health Research, University of Ostrava Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2027-7149
Petra BártováNeurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
University of Ostrava · CZUniversity Hospital Ostrava · CZCharles University · CZMasaryk University · CZ

Funding

Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky National Institute for Neurological Research LX22NOstravská Univerzita v Ostravě SGS 11/LF/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTranscranial sonography (TCS) magnetic resonance (MR) fusion imaging and digital image analysis are useful tools for the evaluation of various brain pathologies. This study aimed to compare the echogenicity of predefined brain structures in Huntington's disease (HD) patients and healthy controls by TCS-MR fusion imaging using Virtual Navigator and digitized image analysis. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe echogenicity of the caudate nucleus (CN), substantia nigra (SN), lentiform nucleus (LN), insula, and brainstem raphe (BR) evaluated by TCS-MR fusion imaging using digitized image analysis was compared between 21 HD patients and 23 healthy controls. The cutoff values of echogenicity indices for the CN, LN, insula, and BR with optimal sensitivity and specificity were calculated using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

resultsThe mean echogenicity indices for the CN (67.0±22.6 vs. 37.9±7.6, p<0.0001), LN (110.7±23.6 vs. 59.7±11.1, p<0.0001), and insula (121.7±39.1 vs. 70.8±23.0, p<0.0001) were significantly higher in HD patients than in healthy controls. In contrast, BR echogenicity (24.8±5.3 vs. 30.1±5.3, p<0.001) was lower in HD patients than in healthy controls. The area under the curve was 90.9%, 95.5%, 84.1%, and 81.8% for the CN, LN, insula, and BR, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were 86% and 96%, respectively, for the CN and 90% and 100%, respectively, for the LN.

conclusionIncreased CN, LN, and insula echogenicity and decreased BR echogenicity are typical findings in HD patients. The high sensitivity and specificity of the CN and LN hyperechogenicity in TCS-MR fusion imaging make them promising diagnostic markers for HD.

Indexed as

BrainHuntington DiseaseMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedCaudate NucleusCerebral CortexFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingReference ValuesROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID37224875
PMCPMC11928295
OpenAlexW4377967823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.