Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37224242›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

Living microecological hydrogels for wound healing.

Guopu Chen, Fengyuan Wang, Xiaoxuan Zhang, Yixuan Shang, Yuanjin Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Living Hydrogels: Harnessing Microorganism-Material Synergy for Next-Generation Therapeutics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  7. Therapeutic Gases in Biomedicine: Updates on Nitric Oxide and Beyond.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Nanozyme-Engineered Probiotic Microneedle Patch for Chronic Diabetic Wound Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guopu ChenDepartment of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Institute of Translational Medicine, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210002, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9788-7629
Fengyuan WangDepartment of Dermatology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Xiaoxuan ZhangDepartment of Dermatology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8790-6558
Yixuan ShangDepartment of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Institute of Translational Medicine, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210002, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5779-3556
Yuanjin ZhaoDepartment of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Institute of Translational Medicine, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210002, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9242-4000

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic hard-to-heal wounds draw great attention worldwide, as their treatments are limited by infections and hypoxia. Inspired by the natural oxygen production capacity of algae and the competitive advantage of beneficial bacteria over other microbes, we presented a living microecological hydrogel (LMH) with functionalized

Indexed as

ChlorellaHydrogelsHypoxiaOxygenWound HealingHydrogelsOxygen

Identifiers

PMID37224242
PMCPMC10208562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.