Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37224187›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Confronting historical legacies of biological anthropology in South Africa-Restitution, redress and community-centered science: The Sutherland Nine.

Victoria E Gibbon, Loretta Feris, Joscha Gretzinger, Kathryn Smith, Simon Hall, Nigel Penn, Tinashe E M Mutsvangwa, Michaela Heale, Devin A Finaughty, Yvonne W Karanja and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Victoria E GibbonDivision of Clinical Anatomy and Biological Anthropology, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7875-3297
Loretta FerisDepartment of Public Law, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Joscha GretzingerMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Kathryn SmithFace Lab, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7918-6367
Simon HallDepartment of Archaeology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Nigel PennDepartment of History, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Tinashe E M MutsvangwaDivision of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Michaela HealeDepartment of Archaeology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Devin A FinaughtyDivision of Clinical Anatomy and Biological Anthropology, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Yvonne W KaranjaDivision of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jan EsterhuyseUniversity of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Daniël KotzeDivision of Clinical Anatomy and Biological Anthropology, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7495-7137
Nina BarnesOffice for Inclusivity & Change, Office of the Deputy Vice Chancellor for Transformation: University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Geney GunstonDivision of Clinical Anatomy and Biological Anthropology, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Je'nine MayOffice for Inclusivity & Change, Office of the Deputy Vice Chancellor for Transformation: University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Johannes KrauseMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Caroline M WilkinsonFace Lab, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Stephan SchiffelsMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.
Doreen FebruarieSocial Work Private Practice, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sianne AlvesOffice for Inclusivity & Change, Office of the Deputy Vice Chancellor for Transformation: University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Judith C SealyDepartment of Archaeology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5071-8211

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a process of restitution of nine unethically acquired human skeletons to their families, together with attempts at redress. Between 1925-1927 C.E., the skeletonised remains of nine San or Khoekhoe people, eight of them known-in-life, were removed from their graves on the farm Kruisrivier, near Sutherland in the Northern Cape Province of South Africa. They were donated to the Anatomy Department at the University of Cape Town. This was done without the knowledge or permission of their families. The donor was a medical student who removed the remains from the labourers' cemetery on his family farm. Nearly 100 years later, the remains are being returned to their community, accompanied by a range of community-driven interdisciplinary historical, archaeological and analytical (osteobiographic, craniofacial, ancient DNA, stable isotope) studies to document, as far as possible, their lives and deaths. The restitution process began by contacting families living in the same area with the same surnames as the deceased. The restitution and redress process prioritises the descendant families' memories, wishes and desire to understand the situation, and learn more about their ancestors. The descendant families have described the process as helping them to reconnect with their ancestors. A richer appreciation of their ancestors' lives, gained in part from scientific analyses, culminating with reburial, is hoped to aid the descendant families and wider community in [re-]connecting with their heritage and culture, and contribute to restorative justice, reconciliation and healing while confronting a traumatic historical moment. While these nine individuals were exhumed as specimens, they will be reburied as people.

Indexed as

AnthropologyArchaeologyCemeteriesDNA, AncientHumansSouth AfricaDNA, Ancient

Identifiers

PMID37224187
PMCPMC10208512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.