Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37224125›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Improving success of non-communicable diseases mobile phone surveys: Results of two randomized trials testing interviewer gender and message valence in Bangladesh and Uganda.

Alain Labrique, Madhuram Nagarajan, Gulam Muhammed Al Kibria, Andres Vecino-Ortiz, George W Pariyo, Joseph Ali, Michelle R Kaufman, Dustin Gibson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03772431 (A Randomized Controlled Trial of Narrative Voice and Introduction Content to Improve Interactive Voice Response), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03772431 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Narrative Voice and Introduction Content to Improve Interactive Voice Response (IVR) Survey Performance in Bangladesh and Uganda

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthRan2017 to 2017Enrolled5,580ConditionsSurveys and Questionnaires, Noncommunicable DiseasesArmsFemale Voice, Motivational Introduction, Male Voice, Informational Introduction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alain LabriqueJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Madhuram NagarajanJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Gulam Muhammed Al KibriaJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7037-6658
Andres Vecino-OrtizJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
George W PariyoMakerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Joseph AliJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4767-2512
Michelle R KaufmanJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Dustin GibsonJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough interactive voice response (IVR) is a promising mobile phone survey (MPS) method for public health data collection in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), participation rates for this method remain lower than traditional methods. This study tested whether using different introductory messages increases the participation rates of IVR surveys in two LMICs, Bangladesh and Uganda.

methodsWe conducted two randomized, controlled micro-trials using fully-automated random digit dialing to test the impact of (1) the gender of the speaker recording the survey (i.e., survey voice); and (2) the valence of the invitation to participate in the survey (i.e., survey introduction) on response and cooperation rates. Participants indicated their consent by using the keypad of cellphones. Four study arms were compared: (1) male and informational (MI); (2) female and information (FI); (3) male and motivational (MM); and (4) female and motivational (FM).

resultsBangladesh and Uganda had 1705 and 1732 complete surveys, respectively. In both countries, a majority of the respondents were males, young adults (i.e., 18-29-year-olds), urban residents, and had O-level/above education level. In Bangladesh, the contact rate was higher in FI (48.9%), MM (50.0%), and FM (55.2%) groups than in MI (43.0%); the response rate was higher in FI (32.3%) and FM (33.1%) but not in MM (27.2%) and MI (27.1%). Some differences in cooperation and refusal rates were also observed. In Uganda, MM (65.4%) and FM (67.9%) had higher contact rates than MI (60.8%). The response rate was only higher in MI (52.5%) compared to MI (45.9%). Refusal and cooperation rates were similar. In Bangladesh, after pooling by introductions, female arms had higher contact (52.1% vs 46.5%), response (32.7% vs 27.1%), and cooperation (47.8% vs 40.4%) rates than male arms. Pooling by gender showed higher contact (52.3% vs 45.6%) and refusal (22.5% vs 16.3%) rates but lower cooperation rate (40.0% vs 48.2%) in motivational arms than informational arms. In Uganda, pooling intros did not show any difference in survey rates by gender; however, pooling by intros showed higher contact (66.5% vs 61.5%) and response (50.0% vs 45.2%) rates in motivational arms than informational arms.

conclusionOverall, we found higher survey rates among female voice and motivational introduction arms compared to male voice and informational introduction arm in Bangladesh. However, Uganda had higher rates for motivational intro arms only compared to informational arms. Gender and valence must be considered for successful IVR surveys.

trial registrationName of the registry: ClinicalTrials.gov. Trial registration number: NCT03772431. Date of registration: 12/11/2018, Retrospectively Registered. URL of trial registry record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03772431?term=03772431&cond=Non-Communicable+Disease&draw=2&rank=1. Protocol Availability: https://www.researchprotocols.org/2017/5/e81.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneNoncommunicable DiseasesBangladeshFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesUgandaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID37224125
PMCPMC10208499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.