Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37223973›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

A Virtual Reality-Assisted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for and With Inuit in Québec: Protocol for a Proof-of-Concept Randomized Controlled Trial.

Quinta Seon, Noor Mady, Michelle Yang, Maharshee Karia, Myrna Lashley, Claudia Sescu, Maud Lalonde, Stephen Puskas, Joy Outerbridge, Echo Parent-Racine and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Quinta SeonDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9542-1884
Noor MadyDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7830-4173
Michelle YangInterdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7380-3961
Maharshee KariaDouglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8728-0831
Myrna LashleyDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9172-6699
Claudia SescuIvirtivik Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7130-4955
Maud LalondeIvirtivik Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1149-909X
Stephen PuskasMakivik Corporation, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3096-5191
Joy OuterbridgeUllivik Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8320-0566
Echo Parent-RacineDouglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0628-8346
Catherine PagiatakisNational Research Council, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1972-0406
Liliana Gomez-CardonaDouglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2285-4296
Di JiangNational Research Council, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1334-6444
Stéphane BouchardDepartment of Psychoeducation and Psychology, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Outaouais, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5995-340X
Outi LinnarantaFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0383-7215
Douglas Mental Health University Institute · CAMcGill University · CANational Research Council Canada · CAFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIMakivik Corporation · CAUniversité du Québec en Outaouais · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmotion regulation is an ability related to psychological well-being; when dysregulated, individuals may have psychiatric symptoms and maladapted physiological responses. Virtual reality-assisted cognitive behavioral therapy (VR-CBT) is an effective psychotherapy to target and strengthen emotion regulation; however, it currently lacks cultural sensitivity and can be improved by adapting it to the cultural context of service users. During previous participatory research, we co-designed a culturally adapted cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) manual and 2 virtual reality (VR) environments to function as a complement to therapy (VR-CBT) for Inuit who would like to access psychotherapy. Emotion regulation skill building will occur in virtual environments that have interactive components such as heart rate biofeedback.

objectiveWe describe a protocol for a proof-of-concept 2-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) with Inuit (n=40) in Québec. The primary aims of this research are to investigate the feasibility, benefits, and challenges of the culturally adapted VR-CBT intervention versus an established VR self-management that is available commercially. We will also investigate self-rated mental well-being and objective psychophysiological measures. Finally, we will use proof-of-concept data to identify suitable primary outcome measures, conduct power calculations in a larger trial for efficacy, and collect information about preferences for on-site or at-home treatment.

methodsTrial participants will be randomly assigned to an active condition or active control condition in a 1:1 ratio. Inuit aged 14 to 60 years will receive a culturally adapted and therapist-guided VR-CBT with biofeedback or a VR relaxation program with nonpersonalized guided components over a 10-week period. We will collect pre- and posttreatment measures of emotion regulation and biweekly assessments over the treatment and at 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome will be measured by the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-16) and a novel psychophysiological reactivity paradigm. Secondary measures include psychological symptoms and well-being via rating scales (eg, anxiety or depressive symptoms).

resultsAs this is the prospective registration of an RCT protocol, we do not yet report any results from the trial. Funding was confirmed in January 2020, and recruitment is expected to start in March 2023 and is set to finish in August 2025. The expected results are to be published in spring 2026.

conclusionsThe proposed study responds to the community's desire for accessible and appropriate resources for psychological well-being, as it was developed in active collaboration with the Inuit community in Québec. We will test feasibility and acceptance by comparing a culturally adapted, on-site psychotherapy with a commercial self-management program while incorporating novel technology and measurement in the area of Indigenous health. We also aim to fulfill the needs for RCT evidence of culturally adapted psychotherapies that are lacking in Canada.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 21831510; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN21831510. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/40236.

Indexed as

biofeedbackco-designcognitive behavioral therapycultural adaptationemotion regulationIndigenousInuit healthrandomized controlled trialvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID37223973
PMCPMC10248771
OpenAlexW4320071656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.