Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37223968›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Designing a Dyad-Based Digital Health Intervention to Reduce Sedentary Time in Black Breast Cancer Survivors and Their First-degree Relatives: Human-Centered Design Study.

Meghan Blazey, Catherine Marinac, Jessica Whiteley, Sarah Peterson, Karen Burns White, Cathyanah Jacques, Helen Lam, Barbara Halpenny, Shree Patel, Raymond Lamothe and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05011279 ("Sitting Less, Moving More"), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05011279 nacompletednot on this map

"Sitting Less, Moving More": Designing a Digital Health Intervention for Black and African American Women Breast Cancer Survivors and Their At-risk Relatives (Phase II)

TypeinterventionalSponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRan2021 to 2022Enrolled10ConditionsBreast Cancer Survivor, Breast Cancer, Fitness TrackersArmsMove Together app/Garmin Activity Tracker
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Meghan BlazeySchool of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1433-5915
Catherine MarinacDivision of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9128-3012
Jessica WhiteleyUniversity of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5000-231X
Sarah PetersonMassachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4859-6793
Karen Burns WhiteDivision of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1233-879X
Cathyanah JacquesUniversity of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7637-3053
Helen LamDivision of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3780-2452
Barbara HalpennyDivision of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6273-8674
Shree PatelUniversity of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8183-9868
Raymond LamotheDivision of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5807-8689
Julie WrightUniversity of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5115-7011
University of Massachusetts Boston · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USMassachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

U Mass Boston / DFHCC U54 Partnership (1 of 2)U54CA156732 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Shoba Ramanadhan · 2010 to 2026
$25.6M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA156732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer, the most commonly diagnosed cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related death in women in the United States, disproportionately affects women from minoritized or low socioeconomic backgrounds. The average woman has an approximately 12% lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. Lifetime risk nearly doubles if a woman has a first-degree relative with breast cancer, and the risk increases as multiple family members are affected. Decreasing sedentary behaviors through moving more and sitting less reduces breast cancer risk and improves outcomes for cancer survivors and healthy adults. Digital health solutions, such as mobile apps that are culturally appropriate, designed with input from the target audience, and include social support, are effective at improving health behaviors.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop and evaluate the usability and acceptability of a prototype app designed with a human-centered approach to promote moving more and sitting less in Black breast cancer survivors and their first-degree relatives (parent, child, or sibling).

methodsThis 3-phase study consisted of app development, user testing, and evaluation of user engagement and usability. Key community stakeholders were engaged in the first 2 (qualitative) phases to provide input into developing the prototype app (MoveTogether). After development and user testing, a usability pilot was conducted. Participants were adult breast cancer survivors who identified as Black and agreed to participate with a relative. Participants used the app and a step-tracking watch for 4 weeks. App components included goal setting and reporting, reminders, dyad messaging, and educational resources. Usability and acceptability were assessed with a questionnaire that included the System Usability Scale (SUS) and semistructured interviews. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and content analysis.

resultsParticipants in the usability pilot (n=10) were aged 30 to 50 years (6/10, 60%), not married (8/10, 80%), and college graduates (5/10, 50%). The app was used on average 20.2 (SD 8.9) out of 28 days-SUS score of 72 (range 55-95)-and 70% (7/10) agreed that the app was acceptable, helpful, and gave them new ideas. Additionally, 90% (9/10) found the dyad component helpful and would recommend the app to friends. Qualitative findings suggest that the goal-setting feature was helpful and that the dyad partner (buddy) provided accountability. Participants were neutral regarding the cultural appropriateness of the app.

conclusionsThe MoveTogether app and related components were acceptable for promoting moving more in dyads of breast cancer survivors and their first-degree relatives. The human-centered approach, which involved engaging community members in the development, is a model for future technology development work. Future work should be done to further develop the intervention based on the findings and then test its efficacy to improve sedentary behavior while considering culturally informed strategies for adoption and implementation within the community.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05011279; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05011279.

Indexed as

breast cancer riskbreast cancer survivordigital healthdyad-based interventionmobile phonesedentary behaviorsocial support

Identifiers

PMID37223968
PMCPMC10248783
OpenAlexW4377940716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.