Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37223963›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Patient-Centered Outcomes Associated With a Novel Office-Based Opioid Treatment Program in a District Health Department: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.

Theresa Coles, Hillary Chen, Andrea Des Marais, Nidhi Sachdeva, Christopher Bush, Lisa Macon Harrison, Shauna Guthrie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Theresa ColesDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2941-8999
Hillary ChenDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8272-1941
Andrea Des MaraisDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2914-0109
Nidhi SachdevaDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2632-5214
Christopher BushAetion, Inc, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5375-6459
Lisa Macon HarrisonGranville Vance Public Health, Henderson and Oxford, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2386-4269
Shauna GuthrieGranville Vance Public Health, Henderson and Oxford, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3981-7171
Duke University · USVance-Granville Community College · USAetion (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGranville and Vance counties have some of the highest opioid-related death rates in North Carolina, and have significant unmet needs with regard to opioid treatment. Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is the most effective evidence-based approach to address opioid use disorder. Despite demonstrated efficacy and substantial need, access to MOUD is still insufficient in many parts of the United States. In order to connect patients with needed MOUD services, the district health department, Granville Vance Public Health (GVPH), established an office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) program.

objectiveIn this formative pilot study, we sought to describe patients' goals and outcomes in a program delivered at a rural local health department using an integrated care approach.

methodsWe used a mixed methods concurrent nested research design. The primary method of investigation was one-on-one qualitative interviews with active OBOT patients (n=7) focused on patients' goals and perceived impacts of the program. Trained interviewers followed a semistructured interview guide developed iteratively by the study team. The secondary method was a descriptive quantitative analysis (79 patients; 1478 visits over 2.5 years) of treatment retention and patient-reported outcomes (anxiety and depression).

resultsParticipants in the OBOT program were 39.6 years of age on average, and 25.3% (20/79) were uninsured. The average retention in the program was 18.4 months. The proportion of individuals in the program with moderate to severe depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores ≥10) decreased between program initiation (66%, 23/35) and at the most recent assessment (34%, 11/32). In qualitative interviews, participants credited the OBOT program for reducing or stopping the use of opioids and other substances (eg, marijuana, cocaine, and benzodiazepines). Many participants noted how the program helped them manage withdrawal symptoms and cravings, which helped them feel more in control of their use. Participants also attributed improvements in quality of life to the OBOT program, such as improved relationships with loved ones, improved mental and physical health, and improved financial stability.

conclusionsInitial data show promising patient outcomes for active GVPH OBOT participants, including reduction in opioid use and improvements in quality of life. As a pilot study, a limitation of this study is a lack of a comparison group. However, this formative project demonstrates promising patient-centered outcome improvements for GVPH OBOT participants.

Indexed as

integrated caremental healthopioidopioid treatmentopioid use disorderpatient-centered outcomespublic health

Identifiers

PMID37223963
PMCPMC10248770
OpenAlexW4360774725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.