Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37223690›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Multimodal analysis of genome-wide methylation, copy number aberrations, and end motif signatures enhances detection of early-stage breast cancer.

Thi Mong Quynh Pham, Thanh Hai Phan, Thanh Xuan Jasmine, Thuy Thi Thu Tran, Le Anh Khoa Huynh, Thi Loan Vo, Thi Huong Thoang Nai, Thuy Trang Tran, My Hoang Truong, Ngan Chau Tran and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Thi Mong Quynh PhamMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thanh Hai PhanUltrasound Department Medic Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thanh Xuan JasmineUltrasound Department Medic Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thuy Thi Thu TranMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Le Anh Khoa HuynhMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thi Loan VoUltrasound Department Medic Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thi Huong Thoang NaiUltrasound Department Medic Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thuy Trang TranUltrasound Department Medic Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
My Hoang TruongUltrasound Department Medic Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Ngan Chau TranUltrasound Department Medic Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Van Thien Chi NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Trong Hieu NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thi Hue Hanh NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Nguyen Duy Khang LeMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thanh Dat NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Duy Sinh NguyenResearch and Development Department Gene Solutions, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Dinh Kiet TruongMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thi Thanh Thuy DoMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Minh-Duy PhanMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Hoa GiangMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Hoai-Nghia NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Le Son TranMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Agricultural Genetics Institute · VNUniversity Medical Center HCMC · VNTrường ĐH Nguyễn Tất Thành · VNVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer causes the most cancer-related death in women and is the costliest cancer in the US regarding medical service and prescription drug expenses. Breast cancer screening is recommended by health authorities in the US, but current screening efforts are often compromised by high false positive rates. Liquid biopsy based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a potential approach to screen for cancer. However, the detection of breast cancer, particularly in early stages, is challenging due to the low amount of ctDNA and heterogeneity of molecular subtypes. Methods: Here, we employed a multimodal approach, namely Screen for the Presence of Tumor by DNA Methylation and Size (SPOT-MAS), to simultaneously analyze multiple signatures of cell free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma samples of 239 nonmetastatic breast cancer patients and 278 healthy subjects. Results: We identified distinct profiles of genome-wide methylation changes (GWM), copy number alterations (CNA), and 4-nucleotide oligomer (4-mer) end motifs (EM) in cfDNA of breast cancer patients. We further used all three signatures to construct a multi-featured machine learning model and showed that the combination model outperformed base models built from individual features, achieving an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95), a sensitivity of 65% at 96% specificity. Discussion: Our findings showed that a multimodal liquid biopsy assay based on analysis of cfDNA methylation, CNA and EM could enhance the accuracy for the detection of early- stage breast cancer.

Indexed as

breast cancer early detectioncfDNA (circulating cell-free DNA)copy number aberration (CNA)ctDNA (circulating tumor DNA)end motifmachine learning modelSPOT-MAS (Screen for the Presence Of Tumor by DNA Methylation And Size)whole genome methylation

Identifiers

PMID37223690
PMCPMC10200909
OpenAlexW4375864405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.