Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37223677›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Convolutional neural network to predict IDH mutation status in glioma from chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging at 7 Tesla.

Yifan Yuan, Yang Yu, Jun Chang, Ying-Hua Chu, Wenwen Yu, Yi-Cheng Hsu, Liebig Alexander Patrick, Mianxin Liu, Qi Yue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yifan YuanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yang YuNational Center for Neurological Disorders, Shanghai, China.
Jun ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ying-Hua ChuMagnetic Resonance (MR) Collaboration, Siemens Healthineers Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Wenwen YuInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yi-Cheng HsuMagnetic Resonance (MR) Collaboration, Siemens Healthineers Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Liebig Alexander PatrickSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany.
Mianxin LiuShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, China.
Qi YueDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and goal: Noninvasive prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status in glioma guides surgical strategies and individualized management. We explored the capability on preoperatively identifying IDH status of combining a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a novel imaging modality, ultra-high field 7.0 Tesla (T) chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging. Method: We enrolled 84 glioma patients of different tumor grades in this retrospective study. Amide proton transfer CEST and structural Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging at 7T were performed preoperatively, and the tumor regions are manually segmented, leading to the "annotation" maps that offers the location and shape information of the tumors. The tumor region slices in CEST and T1 images were further cropped out as samples and combined with the annotation maps, which were inputted to a 2D CNN model for generating IDH predictions. Further comparison analysis to radiomics-based prediction methods was performed to demonstrate the crucial role of CNN for predicting IDH based on CEST and T1 images. Results: A fivefold cross-validation was performed on the 84 patients and 4090 slices. We observed a model based on only CEST achieved accuracy of 74.01% ± 1.15%, and the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8022 ± 0.0147. When using T1 image only, the prediction performances dropped to accuracy of 72.52% ± 1.12% and AUC of 0.7904 ± 0.0214, which indicates no superiority of CEST over T1. However, when we combined CEST and T1 together with the annotation maps, the performances of the CNN model were further boosted to accuracy of 82.94% ± 1.23% and AUC of 0.8868 ± 0.0055, suggesting the importance of a joint analysis of CEST and T1. Finally, using the same inputs, the CNN-based predictions achieved significantly improved performances above those from radiomics-based predictions (logistic regression and support vector machine) by 10% to 20% in all metrics. Conclusion: 7T CEST and structural MRI jointly offer improved sensitivity and specificity of preoperative non-invasive imaging for the diagnosis of IDH mutation status. As the first study of CNN model on imaging acquired at ultra-high field MR, our results could demonstrate the potential of combining ultra-high-field CEST and CNN for facilitating decision-making in clinical practice. However, due to the limited cases and B1 inhomogeneities, the accuracy of this model will be improved in our further study.

Indexed as

chemical exchange saturation transferconvolutional neural networkgliomaradiomicsultra-high field MR

Identifiers

PMID37223677
PMCPMC10200907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.