ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2022
Integrating Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches for Neural Classification.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurons can code for multiple variables simultaneously and neuroscientists are often interested in classifying neurons based on their receptive field properties. Statistical models provide powerful tools for determining the factors influencing neural spiking activity and classifying individual neurons. However, as neural recording technologies have advanced to produce simultaneous spiking data from massive populations, classical statistical methods often lack the computational efficiency required to handle such data. Machine learning (ML) approaches are known for enabling efficient large scale data analyses; however, they typically require massive training sets with balanced data, along with accurate labels to fit well. Additionally, model assessment and interpretation are often more challenging for ML than for classical statistical methods. To address these challenges, we develop an integrated framework, combining statistical modeling and machine learning approaches to identify the coding properties of neurons from large populations. In order to demonstrate this framework, we apply these methods to data from a population of neurons recorded from rat hippocampus to characterize the distribution of spatial receptive fields in this region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.