Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37223657›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2023

Predicting the COVID-19 mortality among Iranian patients using tree-based models: A cross-sectional study.

Amirhossein Aghakhani, Jaleh Shoshtarian Malak, Zahra Karimi, Fardis Vosoughi, Hojjat Zeraati, Mir Saeed Yekaninejad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amirhossein AghakhaniDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-1804-6034
Jaleh Shoshtarian MalakDepartment of Digital Health, School of Medicine Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Zahra KarimiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Fardis VosoughiDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Shariati Hospital and School of Medicine Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Hojjat ZeraatiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Mir Saeed YekaninejadDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: To explore the use of different machine learning models in prediction of COVID-19 mortality in hospitalized patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 44,112 patients from six academic hospitals who were admitted for COVID-19 between March 2020 and August 2021 were included in this study. Variables were obtained from their electronic medical records. Random forest-recursive feature elimination was used to select key features. Decision tree, random forest, LightGBM, and XGBoost model were developed. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F-1 score, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-AUC were used to compare the prediction performance of different models. Results: Random forest-recursive feature elimination selected following features to include in the prediction model: Age, sex, hypertension, malignancy, pneumonia, cardiac problem, cough, dyspnea, and respiratory system disease. XGBoost and LightGBM showed the best performance with an ROC-AUC of 0.83 [0.822-0.842] and 0.83 [0.816-0.837] and sensitivity of 0.77. Conclusion: XGBoost, LightGBM, and random forest have a relatively high predictive performance in prediction of mortality in COVID-19 patients and can be applied in hospital settings, however, future research are needed to externally confirm the validation of these models.

Indexed as

COVID‐19gradient boostingmachine learningprediction

Identifiers

PMID37223657
PMCPMC10200963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.