Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37223393›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2023

Treatment decisions in VRE bacteraemia: a survey of infectious diseases pharmacists.

Bryan P White, Katie E Barber, Daniel B Chastain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methicillin-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Contemporary Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia-Controversies in Clinical Practice.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bryan P WhiteUniversity of Oklahoma Medical Center, Department of Pharmacy, 700 NE 13th St, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5657-7069
Katie E BarberDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Mississippi College of Pharmacy, 2500 North State Street, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8411-3111
Daniel B ChastainDepartment of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, 1000 Jefferson Street, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4018-0195
Georgia College & State University · USState Street (United States) · USUniversity of Oklahoma Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: VRE infections increased in 2020. High-dose daptomycin (≥10 mg/kg) has shown mortality benefit over other regimens, though daptomycin resistance is increasing. Limited data exist on the practice patterns of ID pharmacists for VRE bloodstream infections (VRE BSIs). Objectives: To describe practice patterns for VRE BSI in ID pharmacists. Methods: A 22-question REDCap survey was distributed to ID pharmacist members of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) Infectious Diseases Practice and Research Network (ID PRN) via e-mail listserv. The survey was distributed on 7 April 2022 and remained open for 4 weeks. Results: Sixty-eight pharmacists responded. All pharmacists completed additional training or certification in infectious diseases past their PharmD, and most (70.5%) had been practising for 10 years or less. Pharmacists at academic medical centres (80.0%) were more likely ( Conclusions: ID pharmacists overwhelmingly selected high-dose daptomycin for VRE BSI. There were variations in practice and response rate when selecting combination therapy, managing persistent bacteraemia, and treating patients with high daptomycin MICs or previous exposure to daptomycin.

Identifiers

PMID37223393
PMCPMC10202426
OpenAlexW4377293747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.