Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37223233›Full record

ReviewClinics in colon and rectal surgery2023

National Databases for Assessment of Quality.

Hillary R Johnson, Jacqueline A Murtha, Julia R Berian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hillary R JohnsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Jacqueline A MurthaDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Julia R BerianDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.

Funding

TRAINING IN NUTRITIONT32DK007665 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GUY E GROBLEWSKI, Chi- Liang Eric Yen · 1993 to 2026
$9.2M
UW Surgical Oncology Research Training Program (UW-SORT)T32CA090217 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Muhammed Murtaza, Heather B Neuman · 2001 to 2026
$8.3M
Preparing older adults for major abdominal surgery: a systems engineering approach to implement preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessmentsK23AG081487 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Julia Rose Berian · 2023 to 2026
$762k
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA090217NIA NIH HHS K23 AG081487NIA NIH HHS L30 AG079385NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rise in the availability of large health care datasets, database research has become an important tool for colorectal surgeon to assess health care quality and implement practice changes. In this chapter, we will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of database research for quality improvement, review common markers of quality for colorectal surgery, provide an overview of frequently used datasets (including Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program, National Surgical Quality Improvement Project, National Cancer Database, National Inpatient Sample, Medicare Data, and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results), and look ahead to the future of database research for the improvement of quality.

Indexed as

database researchquality improvementquality in colorectal surgery

Identifiers

PMID37223233
PMCPMC10202538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.