Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37223006›Full record

ArticleInnovation in aging2023

Trends in Gender and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Physical Disability and Social Support Among U.S. Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment Living Alone, 2000-2018.

Shanquan Chen, Huanyu Zhang, Benjamin R Underwood, Dan Wang, Xi Chen, Rudolf N Cardinal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation in aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Shanquan ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4724-4892
Huanyu ZhangShenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6480-2510
Benjamin R UnderwoodDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3427-9487
Dan WangFaculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4804-9578
Xi ChenSchool of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2058-0351
Rudolf N CardinalDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8751-5167
University of Cambridge · GBChinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen · CNOntario Tech University · CAUniversity of London · GBYale University · US

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Albert C Shaw · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
A Life Course Approach to Understanding Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias and Health CareR01AG077529 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Xi Chen · 2022 to 2026
$3.6M
Social Pension, Health, and Healthy AgingK01AG053408 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, XI · 2018 to 2021
$514k
Medical Research Council MC_PC_17213Medical Research Council MR/W014386/1NIA NIH HHS K01 AG053408NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS R01 AG077529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Informal care is the primary source of support for older adults with cognitive impairment, yet is less available to those who live alone. We examined trends in the prevalence of physical disability and social support among older adults with cognitive impairment living alone in the United States. Research Design and Methods: We analyzed 10 waves of data from the U.S. Health and Retirement Survey spanning 2000-2018. Eligible people were those aged ≥65, having cognitive impairment, and living alone. Physical disability and social support were measured via basic and instrumental activities of daily living (BADLs, IADLs). We estimated linear temporal trends for binary/integer outcomes via logistic/Poisson regression, respectively. Results: A total of 20 070 participants were included. Among those reporting BADL/IADL disability, the proportion unsupported for BADLs decreased significantly over time (odds ratio [OR] 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-0.99), and the proportion unsupported for IADLs increased (OR = 1.02, CI 1.01-1.04). Among those receiving IADL support, the number of unmet IADL support needs increased significantly over time (relative risk [RR] 1.04, CI 1.03-1.05). No gender disparities were found for these trends. Over time, Black respondents had a relatively increasing trend of being BADL-unsupported (OR = 1.03, CI 1.0-1.05) and Hispanic and Black respondents had a relatively increasing trend in the number of unmet BADL needs (RR = 1.02, CI 1.00-1.03; RR = 1.01, CI 1.00-1.02, respectively), compared to the corresponding trends in White respondents. Discussion and Implications: Among lone-dwelling U.S. older adults with cognitive impairment, fewer people received IADL support over time, and the extent of unmet IADL support needs increased. Racial/ethnic disparities were seen both in the prevalence of reported BADL/IADL disability and unmet BADL/IADL support needs; some but not all were compatible with a reduction in disparity over time. This evidence could prompt interventions to reduce disparities and unmet support needs.

Indexed as

Cognitive impairmentGender disparityPhysical disabilityRacial/ethnic disparitySocial support

Identifiers

PMID37223006
PMCPMC10202553
OpenAlexW4328115606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.