Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37222993›Full record

ArticleProceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition2022

Understanding Uncertainty Maps in Vision with Statistical Testing.

Jurijs Nazarovs, Zhichun Huang, Songwong Tasneeyapant, Rudrasis Chakraborty, Vikas Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jurijs NazarovsUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.
Zhichun HuangCarnegie Mellon University.
Songwong TasneeyapantUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.
Rudrasis ChakrabortyButlr.
Vikas SinghUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.

Funding

Preclinical AD ConsortiumRF1AG059869 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ALBERT, MARILYN S. · 2018 to 2018
$7.7M
Algebraic Formulations for Characterizing Structural Brain Connectivity Changes and Pathology Transmission Networks in Preclinical Alzheimer's DiseaseRF1AG059312 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BENDLIN, BARBARA BRIGITTA, SINGH, VIKAS · 2019 to 2019
$1.8M
Maximizing Power in AD Clinical Trials via Multimodal Machine LearningR01AG040396 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SINGH, VIKAS · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
CRCNS: Pooling Multisite data and Staistical Tests for analyzing biomarkers of Alzheimer's diseaseRF1AG062336 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SINGH, VIKAS · 2018 to 2018
$660k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040396NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG059312NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG059869NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG062336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative descriptions of confidence intervals and uncertainties of the predictions of a model are needed in many applications in vision and machine learning. Mechanisms that enable this for deep neural network (DNN) models are slowly becoming available, and occasionally, being integrated within production systems. But the literature is sparse in terms of how to perform statistical tests with the uncertainties produced by these overparameterized models. For two models with a similar accuracy profile, is the former model's uncertainty behavior better in a statistically significant sense compared to the second model? For high resolution images, performing hypothesis tests to generate meaningful actionable information (say, at a user specified significance level

Identifiers

PMID37222993
PMCPMC10205027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.