Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37222779›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2023

Complications associated with minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) for surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database review.

Joao G Porto, Maria Camila Suarez Arbelaez, Ruben Blachman-Braun, Ansh Bhatia, Shivank Bhatia, Ramgopal Satyanarayana, Robert Marcovich, Hemendra N Shah

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Adjustable continence therapy for men (ProACTTranslational andrology and urology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joao G PortoDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6495-1054
Maria Camila Suarez ArbelaezDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0086-9174
Ruben Blachman-BraunDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9700-0805
Ansh BhatiaSeth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6131-4837
Shivank BhatiaDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6610-2550
Ramgopal SatyanarayanaDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, USA.
Robert MarcovichDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, USA.
Hemendra N ShahDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, USA. hns35@miami.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4273-5502
University of Miami · USKing Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMAUDE database houses medical device reports of suspected device-related complications received by Food and Drug Administration. In the present study we aim to evaluate the MAUDE database for reported complications of MIST procedures.

methodsThe database was queried using keywords: rezum, urolift, prostate embolization (PAE), transurethral needle ablation (TUNA), transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT), prostate stent and Temporarily Implanted Nitinol Device (iTIND) on 10/1/22 to extract information regarding device problems and procedure-related complications. Gupta classification system was used to stratify complications. Statistical analysis was performed to compare frequency of complications among MIST procedures.

resultsWe found a total of 692 reports (Rezum-358, urolift-226, PAE-53, TUNA-31, TUMT-19, prostatic stent-4, and iTIND-1). Most complications related to device or users were minor (level 1 and 2) and there was no significant difference among various MIST procedures. The screen/system error was responsible for 93% and 83% aborted cases in Rezum and TUNA, respectively, and PAE showed 40% of device component detachment/fracture. Overall Urolift and TUMT were associated with statistically significant higher incidence of major (level 3 and 4) complications (23% and 21%, respectively) as compared with Rezum (7%). Most major complications needing hospitalization after Urolift included hematoma and hematuria with clots and those after Rezum included urinary tract infection and sepsis. Thirteen deaths were reported, mostly due to cardiovascular events, which were classified as not associated with the proposed treatment.

conclusionMIST for BPH can occasionally cause significant morbidity. Our data should assist urologists and patients in shared decision-making process.

Indexed as

Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsProstatic HyperplasiaTransurethral Resection of ProstateHumansMaleMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresProstateProstatectomyTreatment OutcomeBenign prostatic hyperplasiaComplicationsEnlarged prostateMinimally invasive surgical therapyRezumUrolift

Identifiers

PMID37222779
OpenAlexW4377939725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.