Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37222768›Full record

ArticleDie Anaesthesiologie2023

[Development of a competence catalogue for physicians in training for curriculum creation with respect to delivery room training].

Markus Flentje, Hendrik Eismann, Simon Schwill, Daniel Forstner, Peter Kranke

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Markus FlentjeKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. flentje.markus@mh-hannover.de.
Hendrik EismannKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Simon SchwillAbteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Daniel ForstnerLehr‑/AusbZEins, SanLehrRgt Niederbayern, Gäubodenkaserne, 94351, Feldkirchen, Deutschland.
Peter KrankeKlinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnesthesiologic expertise is used at various points in the delivery room. The natural turnover of professionals requires continuous education and training for patient care. In a first survey among consultants and trainees, the desire for a delivery room-specific anesthesiologic curriculum has emerged. In order to enable a curriculum with decreasing supervision, a competence-oriented catalogue is used in many medical fields. The gain in competence develops gradually. The participation of practitioners should be obligatory to avoid a differentiation between theory and practice. The structural framework of curriculum development by Kern et al. provides the learning objective analysis after further evaluation. In the sense of specific learning objective definition, the present study aims to describe the competences for anesthetists in the delivery room.

methodsAn expert group (active in the anesthesiology delivery room environment) developed a set of items via a two-step online Delphi survey. The experts were recruited from the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI). We evaluated the resulting parameters for relevance and validity in a larger collective. Lastly, we used factorial analyses to identify factors that could be used to group items into relevant scales. In total, 201 participants took part in the final validation survey.

resultsDuring the prioritization process of Delphi analyses, competencies such as neonatal care were not followed up. Not all items developed are exclusively delivery room-related, such as managing a difficult airway. Other items are specific to the environment of obstetrics. One example is integration of spinal anesthesia into the obstetric context. Some items are exclusively related to the delivery room, such as in-house standards of care in obstetrics as a basic skill. After validation, a competence catalogue with 8 scales with a total of 44 competence items resulted (Kayser-Meyer-Olkin criterion 0.88).

conclusionA catalogue of relevant learning objectives for anesthetists in training could be developed. It specifies the generally required content of anesthesiologic training in Germany. Specific patient groups, such as patients with congenital heart defects, are not mapped. Competencies that could also be learned outside the delivery room, should be learned before the rotation. This enables the focus on the delivery room items, especially for those to be trained who do not work in a hospital with obstetrics. The catalogue needs to be revised for completeness for its own working environment. Particularly in hospitals that do not have a pediatrician available, neonatal care becomes significant. Didactic methods, such as entrustable professional activities, have to be tested and evaluated. These enable competence-based learning with decreasing supervision and reflect the reality in hospitals. As not every clinic can provide the necessary resources for this a nationwide provision of documents would be helpful.

Indexed as

Delivery RoomsPhysiciansClinical CompetenceCurriculumFemaleGermanyHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyAnesthesiaCesarean sectioDelivery RoomEvaluationResidency

Identifiers

PMID37222768
PMCPMC10244265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.