Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37222738›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2023

Prevalence and factors associated with sexual dysfunction in brazilian women: a cross-sectional study.

Amanda Magdalena Feroldi Fabricio, Tatiana Oliveira Sato, Stéfany Gomes da Silva, Giovana Garçoni Poli, Clara Maria de Araujo Silva, Roberta de Fátima Carreira Moreira Padovez, Daiana Priscila Rodrigues de Souza, Patricia Driusso, Ana Carolina Sartorato Beleza

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amanda Magdalena Feroldi FabricioUniversity of West Paulista (UNOESTE), Jaú, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tatiana Oliveira SatoFederal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Rod. Washington Luís km 235 -SP-310, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Stéfany Gomes da SilvaFederal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Rod. Washington Luís km 235 -SP-310, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Giovana Garçoni PoliFederal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Rod. Washington Luís km 235 -SP-310, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Clara Maria de Araujo SilvaFederal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Rod. Washington Luís km 235 -SP-310, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Roberta de Fátima Carreira Moreira PadovezFederal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Rod. Washington Luís km 235 -SP-310, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Daiana Priscila Rodrigues de SouzaUniversity of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain.
Patricia DriussoFederal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Rod. Washington Luís km 235 -SP-310, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Sartorato BelezaFederal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Rod. Washington Luís km 235 -SP-310, São Carlos, SP, Brazil. acbeleza@ufscar.br.ORCID 0000-0001-6463-8597
Universidade Federal de São Carlos · BRUniversidade do Oeste Paulista · BRUniversity of Córdoba · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisChanges in the mechanisms that modulate sexual response can contribute to the development of female sexual dysfunction (FSD). Although the prevalence of FSD in Brazil has been established, its associated risk factors have not been thoroughly examined. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of FSD in Brazilian women and identify any factors that may be associated with its presence.

methodsThis study used a cross-sectional design and included women aged 18 years or older who had engaged in sexual activity within the past four weeks. Participants completed the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and a sociodemographic and health questionnaire. Two groups were created based on FSFI scores: those with risk for FSD (score >26.55) and those without. The study used t-tests for independent samples to compare quantitative variables between the groups, and the chi-squared test, to compare categorical variables. Binomial logistic regression was used to test the association between sociodemographic and health variables and FSD.

resultsFSD had a prevalence of 31.7% (95% CI: 28.2%-35.5%). The results indicated that practice of physical activity was inversely associated with FSD (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.45-0.92), whereas urinary incontinence (OR: 2.55, 95% CI: 1.68-3.87) and post-menopause (OR: 4.69, 95% CI: 1.66-13.3) were directly associated with FSD.

conclusionsA high prevalence of FSD was observed among Brazilian women in this study. Physically active women are less likely to have FSD. Menopause and the presence of urinary incontinence can negatively impact female sexual function.

Indexed as

Sexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSexual Dysfunctions, PsychologicalAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultFemale sexual dysfunctionFemale sexual functionFemale sexual function index (FSFI)Sexual healthSexualityWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID37222738
OpenAlexW4377940377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.