Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37222347›Full record

ArticleRevista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes2023

Challenges to implement laparoscopic appendectomy as the first-line treatment for acute appendicitis: a fifteen-year experience in a tertiary hospital in Brazil.

Sergio Henrique Bastos Damous, Carlos Augusto Metidieri Menegozzo, Marcelo Cristiano Rocha, Francisco Salles Collet-E-Silva, Edivaldo Massazo Utiyama

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Laparoscopy in Trauma: Can Brazil fit into the global trend?Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sergio Henrique Bastos Damous- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Cirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1374-225X
Carlos Augusto Metidieri Menegozzo- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Cirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3572-8977
Marcelo Cristiano Rocha- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Cirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6821-2286
Francisco Salles Collet-E-Silva- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Cirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8756-5992
Edivaldo Massazo Utiyama- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Cirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8453-7184
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundthe barriers to implement emergency laparoscopy in public teaching hospitals involve issues such as resident learning curves and resource costs and availability. This study was designed to describe the issues facing the implementation of laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis over 15 years in a single academic center in Brazil. MATERIALS AND

methodsretrospective study of patients undergoing emergency appendectomy from 2004 to 2018. Clinical data were compared to four major actions implemented in the emergency surgical service: minimally invasive surgery training for residents (2007), laparoscopic stump closure using metal clips (2008), 24/7 availability of laparoscopic instruments for emergency surgeries (2010), and third-party contract for maintenance of the laparoscopic instruments and implementation of polymeric clips for stump closure (2013). We evaluated the increase in laparoscopic appendectomy after the implementation of those major changes.

resultswe identified 1168 appendectomies during the study period, of which 691 (59%), 465 (40%), and 12 (1%) were open, laparoscopic, and converted, respectively. The implementation of the major changes since 2004 resulted in an increase of laparoscopic appendectomies from 11% in 2007 to 80% in 2016. These actions were decisive in the widespread use of laparoscopy for acute appendicitis (p<0.001). The standardization of the hem-o-lok clip in the treatment of the appendiceal stump made the procedure more feasible, reducing the surgical time using laparoscopic access and increasing the team's adherence, so that this became the route of choice in about 85% of cases in the period from 2014 to 2018, 80% performed by 3rd year resident physicians. No intraoperative complications were noted related to laparoscopic access, even in more complicated appendicitis. There was no mortality reported, no reoperations or readmissions to hospital during a 30-day postoperative period.

conclusionthe development of a feasible, reproducible, and safe technical standardization, associated with continuous cost optimization, are the cornerstones for a consistent and viable change in the current practice for appendectomies in middle and lower-income countries.

Indexed as

AppendicitisLaparoscopyAcute DiseaseAppendectomyBrazilHumansRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care Centers

Identifiers

PMID37222347
PMCPMC10508672
OpenAlexW4377940155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.