Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37222229›Full record

ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2023

Diffusion tensor imaging-based machine learning for IDH wild-type glioblastoma stratification to reveal the biological underpinning of radiomic features.

Zilong Wang, Fangzhan Guan, Wenchao Duan, Yu Guo, Dongling Pei, Yuning Qiu, Minkai Wang, Aoqi Xing, Zhongyi Liu, Bin Yu and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zilong WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Fangzhan GuanDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Wenchao DuanDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yu GuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Dongling PeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yuning QiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Minkai WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Aoqi XingDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhongyi LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Bin YuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Hongwei ZhengDepartment of MRI, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xianzhi LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Dongming YanDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yuchen JiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jingliang ChengDepartment of MRI, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jing YanDepartment of MRI, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhenyu ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5570-090X
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study addresses the lack of systematic investigation into the prognostic value of hand-crafted radiomic features derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type glioblastoma (GBM), as well as the limited understanding of the biological interpretation of individual DTI radiomic features and metrics.

aimsTo develop and validate a DTI-based radiomic model for predicting prognosis in patients with IDH wild-type GBM and reveal the biological underpinning of individual DTI radiomic features and metrics.

resultsThe DTI-based radiomic signature was an independent prognostic factor (p < 0.001). Incorporating the radiomic signature into a clinical model resulted in a radiomic-clinical nomogram that predicted survival better than either the radiomic model or clinical model alone, with a better calibration and classification accuracy. Four categories of pathways (synapse, proliferation, DNA damage response, and complex cellular functions) were significantly correlated with the DTI-based radiomic features and DTI metrics.

conclusionThe prognostic radiomic features derived from DTI are driven by distinct pathways involved in synapse, proliferation, DNA damage response, and complex cellular functions of GBM.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesIsocitrate Dehydrogenasebiological pathwaydiffusion tensor imagingglioblastomamachine learningprognosis

Identifiers

PMID37222229
PMCPMC10580329
OpenAlexW4377940634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.